Eaton v Storer
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1882 |
| Year | 1882 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
- Vasudevan Vazhappulli Raman v T. Damodaran P.v Raman and Another
-
Finnegan v Parkside Health Authority
...costs, the time ought to be extended for the plaintiff to appeal. Mr. Colin Duncan referred us to the old cases in the last century of Eaton v. Storer [1882] 22 Ch.D. 91, and Atwood v. Chichester [1878] 3 QBD 722, and urged that time does no matter as long as the costs are paid. Nowadays we......
-
Allen v Sir Alfred McAlpine & Sons Ltd
...within a stated time. Such has been the practice, it was said, for a great many years. It was confirmed by Sir George Jessel, M. R., in Eaton v. Storer (1882) 22 Chancery Division at p. 92: and it should not be changed without prior notice. I cannot accept this suggestion. It there were suc......
-
Margaret Kidd v Shenette Arju & Richard Gordon
...at 774 were instructive as to the approach of the courts. "Counsel for the Plaintiff referred us to the old cases in the last century of Eaton v Storer (1882) 22 Ch.91 and Attwood v Chichester (1878) 3 QBD.722 and urged that time does not matter as long as the costs are paid. Nowadays we re......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
PRINCIPLES GOVERNING THE COURT’S DISCRETION TO EXTEND TIME
...course of this article. 9 [1969] 1 All ER 772. 10 Ibid, at 773—774. 11 Supra. 12 [1969] 1 All ER 772, at 773—774. As was Eaton v Storer(1882) 22 Ch D 91 (in which the Atwood principle was accepted). 13 [1969] 1 All ER 772, at 774. 14 Ibid. 15 Supra. 16 [1965] 1 WLR 8, at 12. 17 The pronounc......