Eckersley v Mersey Docks and Harbour Board
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1894 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
26 cases
-
The King (Taverner) v Justices of County Tyrone
...must be a real likelihood of bias. The statement in the judgment of Lord Esher, M.R., in Eckersley v. Mersey Docks and Harbour Board ([1894] 2 Q. B. 667, at p. 671), that not only must Judges not be biassed, but that, “even though it be demonstrated that they would not be biassed, they ough......
-
De Souza Lionel Jerome v Attorney General
...bias of this sort this court would not interfere; ... (Emphasis added.) A few years later, in Eckersley v Mersey Docks and Harbour Board [1894] 2 QB 667[1891] All ER Rep 1130 Lord Esher MR at p 671 referred to: ...the doctrine which is applied to judges, not merely of the superior courts, b......
-
De Souza Lionel Jerome v Attorney General
...bias of this sort this court would not interfere; ... (Emphasis added.) A few years later, in Eckersley v Mersey Docks and Harbour Board [1894] 2 QB 667[1891] All ER Rep 1130 Lord Esher MR at p 671 referred to: ...the doctrine which is applied to judges, not merely of the superior courts, b......
-
Atteridgeville Town Council and Another v Livanos t/a Livanos Brothers Electrical
...Corporation v E John Aird& Co [1913] AC 241 (HL) at 247,251, 257-8, 260;Eckersley and Others v The Mersey Dock and Harbours Board [1894] 2 QB 667 (CA) at 670-1, 672-3, 673-4; Jackson v Barry Railways Co [1893] l Ch 238 at 249; Tuckers Land and Development Corporation Ltd v Kruger 1973 (4) S......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Contract administration
...[1894] 2 Ch 478 at 485–486, per Lindley LJ, at 491–492, per Lopes LJ, at 494–495, per Kay LJ; Eckersley v Mersey Docks & Harbour Board [1894] 2 QB 667 at 673, per Davey LJ; Page v Llandaf & Dinas Powis RDC (1901) Hudson’s BC (4th edition, volume 2) 316 at 318, per Channell J. In Burton v he......
-
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION AND MULTI-NATIONAL CORPORATIONS PRACTICAL APPROACHES TO ARBITRATION THE HEARING: THE ROLES OF ARBITRAL PANEL AND COUNSEL
...which were binding on him. The cases were: (a) Jackson v. Barry Railway Co. (893) 1 Ch. 238. And (b) Eckersley v. Mersey Dock, etc (1894) 2 Q.B. 667. 4. Bunten & Lancaster (Produce), Ltd v. Kiril Mischeff, Ltd (1964) 1 Lloyd's List Law Rep. 386. The facts and the decision were: Contract ent......
-
Divisional Court Cases
...suspicion" was sufficient was supported bythe dictum ofLordEsher in Eckersley v. Mersey Docks andHarbour Board (1894, 2Q.B.667 at 670) thatjudges-"oughtnot act...in a matter where the circumstancesare such that people, not necessarily reasonable people,would suspect them of being biassed."T......