Edkins v Knowles

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1973
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
24 cases
  • People v Kelly (No. 2)
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 1983
    ...v. Charlton [1979] I.R. 149. 15 R. v. Turnbull [1977] Q.B. 224. 16 R. v. Cooper [1969] 1 Q.B. 267. 17 R. v. Edkins & Knowles (1973) 57 Cr. App. R. 751. 18 R. v. Hunter [1974] Q.B. 95. 19 R. v. Smith [1973] 1 W.L.R. 1510. 20 Stafford v. Director of Public Prosecutions [1974] A.C. 878. 21 R. ......
  • R. v. Buyco (O.L.), (2010) 489 A.R. 1 (PC)
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 22 January 2010
    ...policeman could properly view the appellant as one 'who is operating a motor vehicle'. The demand was thus proper. Edkins v. Knowles [1973] 2 All E.R. 503,508 (D.C.) seems to give some support, retreating from an earlier very literal interpretation." [96] In Good the officer arrested the ac......
  • R v Reid (Philip)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 15 June 1973
    ...in two cases, one in the Divisional Court by a full Court assisted by no less than three leading counsel, Edkins v. Knowles, 1973 2 All England Reports 503, and the other by the Court of Appeal in R. v. Bates 1973 2 All England Reports 509. In Bates' case the Court of Appeal re-asserted th......
  • DPP (at the suit of Garda Francis McMahon) v John Rafferty
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 29 October 2008
    ...r1(1) DCR O.38 r1(2) DPP v WINSTON UNREP HIGH O'HANLON 25.5.1992 1992/6/1935 THE DISTRICT COURT RULES 1948 SI 431/1947 EDKINS v KNOWLES 1973 QB 748 MISUSE OF DRUGS REGS 1988-1998 HAUGHTON v SMITH 1975 AC 476 HEALY, STATE v DONOGHUE 1976 IR 325 2008/942SS - Charleton - High - 29/10/2008 - 2......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Divisional Court
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 64-4, August 2000
    • 1 August 2000
    ...it was heldthatthevehiclehadceased to be inmotionandthereforethepersonwasundernodutyto produce his driving documents: Edkins vKnowles[1973] RTR 257 followed.FGDavies362 ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT