Edler v Auerbach

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1949
Year1949
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
99 cases
  • Leong Sze Hian v Teo Ai Choo
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 19 April 1983
  • Leong Sze Hian v Teo Ai Choo
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 26 March 1986
    ...beneficially. Counsel for the appellant relied on the fourth proposition enunciated by Devlin J (as he then was) in Edler v Auerbach [1950] 1 KB 359 which was in the following terms: ... fourthly, ... where the court is satisfied that all the relevant facts are before it and it can see clea......
  • Snell v Unity Finance Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 25 June 1963
    ...it". 16That expression of view by Lord Moulton was followed by Mr Justice Devlin (as he then was) in ( Edler v. Auerbach 1950 volume 1 King's Bench Division, page 359), a case concerning the letting of a house which had been let unlawfully, and contrary to the DefenceRegulations, otherwise......
  • Snell v Unity Finance Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 25 June 1963
    ...it". 16That expression of view by Lord Moulton was followed by Mr Justice Devlin (as he then was) in ( Edler v. Auerbach 1950 volume 1 King's Bench Division, page 359), a case concerning the letting of a house which had been let unlawfully, and contrary to the DefenceRegulations, otherwise......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • CONTRACTUAL ILLEGALITY AND CONFLICT OF LAWS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1995, December 1995
    • 1 December 1995
    ...are placed before the court.” The High Court decision was affirmed on appeal, see [1995] 2 S.L.R. 466. 5 See also Edler v. Auerbach[1950] 1 K.B. 359. 6 [1892] 2 Q.B. 724. 7 Ibid., at 728. See also Theresa Chong v. Kin Khoon & Co. [1976] 2 M.L.J. 253 at 256, Malaysian Federal Court. 8 [1966]......
  • REFORMING ILLEGALITY IN PRIVATE LAW
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2009, December 2009
    • 1 December 2009
    ...ER 673 and Waymell v Reed(1794) 101 ER 335. 32 See, eg, Re Mahmoud and Ispahani[1921] 2 KB 716 at 724—725 per Bankes LJ; Edler v Auerbach[1950] 1 KB 359 at 367 per Devlin J. 33 See, eg, Professor Prentice in Chitty on Contracts (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 27th Ed, 1994) ch 16; Professor Furms......
  • A Warm and Dry Place to Live: Energy Efficiency and Rental Accommodation
    • New Zealand
    • Canterbury Law Review No. 19-2013, January 2013
    • 1 January 2013
    ...on the part of the landlord of a dwelling house that the premises are fit for human 35 Hart v Windsor at 87. Also Edler v Auerbach [1950] 1 KB 359. 36 Chappell v Gregory (1864) 34 Beav 250 at 253, 55 ER 631. 37 Balcairn Guest House Ltd v Weir [1963] NZLR 301. 38 Felton v Brightwell [1967] N......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT