Edler v Auerbach

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtKing's Bench Division
Year1949
Date1949

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
91 cases
  • Leong Sze Hian v Teo Ai Choo
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 19 April 1983
  • Teo Ai Choo v Leong Sze Hian
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 26 March 1986
    ...beneficially. Counsel for the appellant relied on the fourth proposition enunciated by Devlin J (as he then was) in Edler v Auerbach [1950] 1 KB 359 which was in the following terms: ... fourthly, ... where the court is satisfied that all the relevant facts are before it and it can see clea......
  • Snell v Unity Finance Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 25 June 1963
    ...it". 16That expression of view by Lord Moulton was followed by Mr Justice Devlin (as he then was) in ( Edler v. Auerbach 1950 volume 1 King's Bench Division, page 359), a case concerning the letting of a house which had been let unlawfully, and contrary to the DefenceRegulations, otherwise......
  • Snell v Unity Finance Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 25 June 1963
    ...it". 16That expression of view by Lord Moulton was followed by Mr Justice Devlin (as he then was) in ( Edler v. Auerbach 1950 volume 1 King's Bench Division, page 359), a case concerning the letting of a house which had been let unlawfully, and contrary to the DefenceRegulations, otherwise......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • A Warm and Dry Place to Live: Energy Efficiency and Rental Accommodation
    • New Zealand
    • Canterbury Law Review No. 19-2013, January 2013
    • 1 January 2013
    ...on the part of the landlord of a dwelling house that the premises are fit for human 35 Hart v Windsor at 87. Also Edler v Auerbach [1950] 1 KB 359. 36 Chappell v Gregory (1864) 34 Beav 250 at 253, 55 ER 631. 37 Balcairn Guest House Ltd v Weir [1963] NZLR 301. 38 Felton v Brightwell [1967] N......