Edmund Evesque de Everwike demise certain terres parcel del Evesque a un Fox
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 356
DEL COMMON-BANK
CXL. Edmund Evesque de Everwike demise certein terres parcel del Evesque a un Fox pur 21 ans del date del Indenture reservant le auncient rent, ou Collyer avoit adon-quea un auncient Lease de niesme le terre que fuit a continue!1 pur 4 ans, apres quel Lease le dit Evesque fuit translate & Edwin fuit create Evesque, & donquea Collyer surrender aon residue de aon terme & prist novel Lease del dit Edwin le terme de 21 ans del date le auncient rent reserve, & ambideux les Leases fuerunt confirmes, &c. Ore les dits 4 ana residue del dit terina devant mencyon pasae. Fox enter, Collyer luy ouste, Fox port breve de Ejectione firniEe, sur quol matter esteant en pleding fuit demurr en Bank, 2 de les Justices faerunt de un opinion & 2 de eux de Tauter part per que jour fuit done en I'Eschamber d'Eschequer devant touts les Juges, & tout le doute surde sur le statute de Anno Regina; nunc primo, sur quel estatute 2 points fuerunt moves si tiel manner del Lease soit grant oue assurance per que estate may or should paase pur 21 ans del temps que le Lease ou grant begin, un auter si le rent est reserve & annuelment payable durant le dit terme, queux points depend sur le Letter & intention del dit estatute, pur le Letter de quel veyes le estatute part [66] fol. 82. Et fuit move que cest Lease est Lease q^ est fait voyd per le dit estatute : & ascuns teign q^ nest Lease pur 21 ans del date del Indenture, mea est voyd pur les 4 ans queux fuerunt durants al temps del feasance de ceo, & donques nest Lease pur 21 ans ne la rent nest reserve annuelment payable durant le dit terme & donques 1'estatute ceo avoyd, a que fuit respond q^ le Letter & intent d'estatute ne tendoit a distroyer cest Lease; car les parols d'estatute ne sont que doit estre Lease pur 21 ans simple-ment sans pluis dire, mes pur 21 ans del temps que tiel Lease grant ou assurance commencer, soil, begin, ore ceo est Lease pur 21 ana de ceo temps; car nest un en commen sense a dire q, avoit Lease pur 21 ana & Lease pur 21 ans a tiel jour q^ est devant le feasance del Lease, & en Case si Lease aoit fait a un pur 21 ans a coraraencer del Feast Saint...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
KIM v THE PEOPLE's REPUBLIC of CHINA
...[26]. 2 Inglin v The United States of America HC Whangarei HB43/01 , 25 January 2002. 3 Sections 50( 1) and 53(1). 4 Sections 13, 39, 51( 1) and 65. 5 Sections 14, 45(2)(a) and (b), 71 and Schedule 6 Section 72(2). 7 B v Police (No 2) [2000] 1 NZLR 31 . 8 Hereora v R [2011] NZCA 491 ; and D......
-
Ministry of Economic Development v Feeney and Ors Dc Ak
...the covenant breach had been waived by the bank such that the debt could properly be classified as non-current in accordance with paras 60(d) and 65 of NZIAS 1. 186 But Ernst & Young and Mr Painter made none of the obvious inquiries. Specifically Mr Painter acknowledged that he had never ev......
-
C v G
...Property Bill was reported by the Justice and Electoral Select Committee, the Committee stated the intention behind the proposed ss 64, 64A and 65 was to: 14 … allow the Court to consider a wider range of circumstances in determining maintenance. Although there is currently a relatively wid......
-
R v R HC AK
...to assess the reasonable needs of the applicant over and above that benefit in terms of the statutory framework provided by ss 63, 64 64A and 65. ( B v K (2006) 26 FRNZ 1 (FAMC)). 10 On the basis of these authorities, Harrison J said that Judge Adams had erred in disregarding Mrs R' receipt......