Edmund Windham port Action de Transgr v Roger Windham a que
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
5 cases
-
Marco Chiro(Appellant) v The Queen
...was initially charged with four separate offences, contrary to ss 49(5) (unlawful sexual intercourse), 56 (aggravated indecent assault) and 58 (procuring an act of gross indecency) of the CLCA. He was convicted by a majority verdict on one count of aggravated indecent assault but his appeal......
-
Max John Beckham v R
...relates to a discussion between Mr Beckham and Ms Taylor during a call on 12 September 2009. The total length of the call was 14 minutes and 58 seconds. There was an exchange comprising about one minute of that call, in which there was a discussion about Detective Sergeant Schmid. In this e......
-
Gregory Durrant Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
...to direct his mind to the question of 'fairness' under section 79(1) of PACE. 26 It is important to note the approach to section 78 ( 1) and 58 of PACE that was adopted in WALSH by the Court of Appeal.9 The Court of Appeal observed that: "The main object of section 58 of the Act and indeed ......
-
Environmental Defence Society Incorporated v The New Zealand King Salmon Company Ltd
...(4 July 1991) 516 NZPD 3019. 18 RMA, s 43AA. 19 Sections 43–44A. 20 Sections 45–55. 21 Sections 56–58A. 22 Section 57(1). 23 Sections 45( 1) and 58. 24 See further [31] and [75]–[91] 25 RMA, s 60(1). 26 Section 59. 27 Section 62(1). 28 Section 64(1). 29 Section 67(1). 30 Section 67(2)(b). 3......
Get Started for Free