Elias v Pasmore

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1934
Year1934
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
44 cases
  • Re Kah Wai Video (Ipoh) Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1987
  • Ghani v Jones
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
    ...v. Waterfield [1964] 1 Q.B. 164; [1963] 3 W.L.R. 946; [1963] 3 All E.R. 659, C.C.A. considered. Dicta of Horridge J. in Elias v. Pasmore [1934] 2 K.B. 164, 173 Per curiam. There is no power to issue a search warrant for murder (post, p. 1165D). The common law does not permit the police to r......
  • Butler v Board of Trade
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ...confidence would not be exercised and the action must be dismissed (post, p. 690D-H). Ghani v. Jones [1970] 1 Q.B. 693, C.A.; Elias v. Pasmore[1934] 2 K.B. 164; Saull v. Browne (1874) 10 Ch.App. 64 andKerr v. Preston Corporation (1876) 6 Ch.D. 463 considered. Quaere. Whether the same result......
  • Truman (Frank) Export Ltd v Metropolitan Police Commissioner
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
    ...Wales) Ltd. v. Jones [1968] 2 Q.B. 299; [1968] 2 W.L.R. 201; [1968] 1 All E.R. 229, C.A. Dwyer v. Collins (1852) 7 Exch. 639. Elias v. Pasmore [1934] 2 K.B. 164. Garfinkel v. Metropolitan Police Commissioner, The Times, September 4, 1971; [1972] Crim.L.R. 44. Ghani v. Jones [1970] 1 Q.B. 69......
  • Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
  • The Supreme Court and foreign sources of law: two hundred years of practice and the juvenile death penalty decision.
    • United States
    • William and Mary Law Review Vol. 47 No. 3, December 2005
    • 1 December 2005
    ...2 D.L.R. 446. ONT. Regina v. Doyle, 12 Ont. 347. SASK. Rex v. Kostachuk, 24 Sask. 485, 54 Can. C.C. 189. ENGLAND See Elias v. Pasmore, [1934] 2 K.B. 164. INDIA ALL. Ali Ahmad Khan v. Emperor, 81 I.C. 615 (1). CAL. Baldeo Bin v. Emperor, 142 I.C. 639. RANG. Chwa Hum Htive v. Emperor, 143 I.C......
  • Subject Index, Volume 76, 2003
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 76-4, September 2003
    • 1 September 2003
    ...340Dowsett (James) v United Kingdom, 24 June (2003) Application No.:00039482/98, ECHR 247–250Elias v Passmore [1934] All ER Rep 380; [1934] 2 KB 164 64, 65Fitt v United Kingdom (2000) 30 EHRR 1 249Ghani v Jones [1969] 3 All ER 1700 62, 64, 65Haggis v DPP (October 2003), QBD 336–340Handyside......
  • Public policy and private illegality in the pursuit of evidence
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 21-1-2, January 2017
    • 1 January 2017
    ...at 259, 262.182. Pringle vBremner and Stirling (1867) 5 Macph (HL) 55.183. See, e.g., RvDerrington (1826) 2 C & P 418. In Elias vPasmore [1934] 2 KB 164, Horridge J held that police, who illegallyseized evidence later admitted in a criminal trial, could not be sued for trespass. Cf. Ghani v......
  • The Promotion Exams
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 40-2, February 1967
    • 1 February 1967
    ...from him and detain any property whichis likely to afford material evidence against him.The principle was reiterated in Elias v. Pasmore [1934] 2 K.B.164, in which Horridge, J., said:"1 think Palles, C.B., inDillonvO'Brien clearly lays down thatconstables are entitled upon a lawful arrest b......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT