Elias v Pasmore

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1934
Year1934
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
40 cases
  • Re Kah Wai Video (Ipoh) Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1987
  • Yong Moi Sin v Kerajaan Malaysia
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1999
  • Hyland v The Commissioner of an Garda Síochána
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 14 November 2023
    ...enabled the seizure of items reasonably thought to provide evidence of other crimes, the limitations required specification generally; Elias v Pasmore [1934] 2 KB 164. The authorities were overthrown in favour of a wide doctrine established in Ghani v Jones and Chic Fashions (West Wales) v......
  • Jason Wall v DPP
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 11 December 2013
    ...(West Wales) Ltd v Jones [1968] 2 QB 299; Compagnie Financiere du Pacifique v Peruvian Guano Company (1882) 11 QBD 55; Elias v Pasmore (1934) 50 TLR 196; R (Ebrahim) v Feltham Magistrates Court [2001] EWHC Admin 130; Ghani v Jones [1970] 1 QB 693; Hazlewood v The Queen [2013] NZCA 406; Jago......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 books & journal articles
  • The Supreme Court and foreign sources of law: two hundred years of practice and the juvenile death penalty decision.
    • United States
    • William and Mary Law Review Vol. 47 No. 3, December 2005
    • 1 December 2005
    ...2 D.L.R. 446. ONT. Regina v. Doyle, 12 Ont. 347. SASK. Rex v. Kostachuk, 24 Sask. 485, 54 Can. C.C. 189. ENGLAND See Elias v. Pasmore, [1934] 2 K.B. 164. INDIA ALL. Ali Ahmad Khan v. Emperor, 81 I.C. 615 (1). CAL. Baldeo Bin v. Emperor, 142 I.C. 639. RANG. Chwa Hum Htive v. Emperor, 143 I.C......
  • Public policy and private illegality in the pursuit of evidence
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 21-1-2, January 2017
    • 1 January 2017
    ...at 259, 262.182. Pringle vBremner and Stirling (1867) 5 Macph (HL) 55.183. See, e.g., RvDerrington (1826) 2 C & P 418. In Elias vPasmore [1934] 2 KB 164, Horridge J held that police, who illegallyseized evidence later admitted in a criminal trial, could not be sued for trespass. Cf. Ghani v......
  • Subject Index, Volume 76, 2003
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 76-4, September 2003
    • 1 September 2003
    ...340Dowsett (James) v United Kingdom, 24 June (2003) Application No.:00039482/98, ECHR 247–250Elias v Passmore [1934] All ER Rep 380; [1934] 2 KB 164 64, 65Fitt v United Kingdom (2000) 30 EHRR 1 249Ghani v Jones [1969] 3 All ER 1700 62, 64, 65Haggis v DPP (October 2003), QBD 336–340Handyside......
  • The Promotion Exams
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 40-2, February 1967
    • 1 February 1967
    ...from him and detain any property whichis likely to afford material evidence against him.The principle was reiterated in Elias v. Pasmore [1934] 2 K.B.164, in which Horridge, J., said:"1 think Palles, C.B., inDillonvO'Brien clearly lays down thatconstables are entitled upon a lawful arrest b......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT