ELLE Trade Mark

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1997
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
34 cases
  • Weir Warman Ltd v Research & Development Pty Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 30 April 2007
    ...Decon Laboratories Ltd v Fred Baker Scientific Ltd [2001] RPC 293 (refd) Demon Ale Trade Mark [2000] RPC 345 (refd) ELLE Trade Marks [1997] FSR 529 (folld) Floris Trade Mark [2001] RPC 329 (folld) Forefront Medical Technology (Pte) Ltd v Modern-Pak Pte Ltd [2006] 1 SLR (R) 927; [2006] 1 SLR......
  • Premier Brands UK Ltd v Typhoon Europe Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
  • Malibu Boats West, Inc. v Catanese
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Martek Biosciences Corp v Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 3 May 2010
    ...created intellectual property rights which conferred statutory monopolies on their proprietors. As Lloyd J held in ELLE Trade Marks [1997] FSR 529 at 536 (“ELLE Trade Marks”): It seems to me that Ladd v Marshall does not apply to an appeal from the Registrar to the High Court, although it n......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Intellectual Property Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2005, December 2005
    • 1 December 2005
    ...was of the view that he had a discretion whether to revoke or not. This view was assumed to be correct by Lloyd J in ELLE Trade Marks[1997] FSR 529 at 532. However, in ZIPPO Trade Mark[1999] RPC 173, another hearing officer took a different view. The issue was then dealt with at length in P......
  • Intellectual Property Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2003, December 2003
    • 1 December 2003
    ...hearing officer came to the conclusion that he had a discretion. This conclusion was assumed to be correct by Lloyd J in Elle Trade Marks[1997] FSR 529 at 532. However, in ZIPPO Trade Mark [1999] RPC 173, another hearing officer took a different view. The issue was dealt with at length in P......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT