Elspeth Christie Reid, PERSONALITY, CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY IN SCOTS LAW Edinburgh: W Green & Son (www.wgreen.co.uk), Scottish Universities Law Institute, 2010. li + 379 pp. ISBN 9780414016811. £120.

Published date01 January 2013
AuthorAbbe E L Brown
Date01 January 2013
DOI10.3366/elr.2013.0142
Pages100-102

Personality, privacy and secrecy are highly topical in contemporary society; consider the Leveson enquiry, the grant of super-injunctions, and the relationships between celebrities, and the rest of us, and social networks. In this insightful, deeply researched and well written contribution, Elspeth Christie Reid, Professor of Scottish Private Law at the University of Edinburgh, reminds us that these do not raise entirely new legal questions and that there are (at least some) answers in Scots law.

Reid does this within the framework of a valuable comparative discussion, which refers in particular to France, Germany, the United States, South Africa, the European Court of Human Rights and England. Reid's work ranges from forms of protecting the physical (such as assault and trespass) to the intangible (such as reputation, image and the control of information). The book begins with an introduction, Part Two explores “Protection of the Person”, Part Three “Protection of Liberty”, Part Four “Defamation and Verbal Injury” and Part Five “Breach of Confidence and Protection of Privacy”. From a practical perspective, the book organises the long list of cases and legislation, by jurisdiction. This, and the structure of the book, makes immediately clear to the reader the breadth, depth and comparative relevance of Reid's work. This also poses a challenge for the reviewer, and the following identifies some highlights and points of particular interest.

The introduction draws from Roman law and Ius Commune, the work of Grotius and Scottish institutional writers (in particular regarding the protection conferred by the delict iniuria in respect of body, reputation and dignity) and on twentieth-century French and German cases. It also examines the importance of contract, for example the Scottish decision in McCosh v Crow (1903) 11 SLT 19, and the established, if less than central, place of the European Convention on Human Rights in the traditional action for breach of confidence (particularly through the decision of the House of Lords in Lord Advocate v Scotsman 1989 SC (HL) 122 and the distinction between the finding of the European Court of Human Rights in Von Hannover v Germany (2005) 40 EHRR 1 and of Lord Bonomy in Martin v McGuiness 2003 SLT 1424 regarding privacy.

From the rest of the book, this reviewer enjoyed discussions of imprisonment without due cause (notably the decision of Beaton v Ivory (1887) 14 R 1057 regarding the arrest of a township during the Skye...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT