Emanuel v Constable
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 26 June 1827 |
Date | 26 June 1827 |
Court | High Court of Chancery |
English Reports Citation: 38 E.R. 639
HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY
S. C. 5 L. J. Ch.(O. S.) 191.
emanuel v. constable. Rolls. June 20, 1827. [S. C. 5 L. J. Ch. (0. S.) 191.] The statute of the 25 G. 2, c. G, does not extend to wills of personal estate only ; and a legacy to a person, who is an attesting witness to such a will, is not void. This was a suit for the administration of the property of a testator, who made a will of personal estate only ; and the question in the cause was, whether a pecuniary legacy to a person, who was a witness to the will, was or was not void under the 25 Geo. 2, c. 6 1 Mr. Sugden and Mr. Phillimore contended, that the legacy was void. The act, they said, declares (s. 1), " that, if any per son shall attest the execution of any will or codicil, which shall be made after the 24th day of June 1752, to whom any beneficial devise, legacy, estate, interest, gift or appointment of or affecting any real or personal estate, other than and except charges on lands, tenements, or hereditaments for payment of any debt or debts shall be thereby given or made, such devise, legacy, estate, interest, gift, or appointment shall, so far only as concerns such person attesting the execution of such will or codicil, or [437] any person claiming under him, be utterly null and void." What more general words could the legislature have used, if it had been their intention to make the act apply to personalty as well as to wills of real estate? The language of the enacting clause, where it is direct and'unam-biguous, cannot be...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Nevin v Nevin
...refers chiefly to the res inter alios acta doctrine. Lord Goddard referred in particular to Blakemore v Glamorganshire Canal Co (1832) 38 E.R. 639, which he said was a clear authority against the admission of this class of evidence. It seems relevant that he considered that the ‘alios’ bein......
-
Davies and Others v Kennedy and Others
...v. M'DowellENR 6 H. L. C. 142. Stafford v. HenryUNK 12 Ir. Eq. Rep. 400. Guinness, Petitioner 1 Ir. Jur. 359. Emmanuel v. ConstableENR 3 Russ. 436. Hawkins v. GathercoleENR 6 De G. M. & G. 421. Stradling v. Morgan Plowd. 204. Salkeld v. JohnstonENR 1 Hare, 196. Crespigny v. WittenoomENR 4 T......
-
Law Union and Rock Insurance Co Ltd v Carmichael's Executor
...v Pemsel (1891, A.C., at p. 543); Halsbury, Laws of England, Vol. 27, p. 117; Maxwell on Statutes, 3rd ed., p. 59; Emanuel v Constable (3 Russ, 436). On ambiguity and on construction of deeds and recitals thereto 1917 AD p595 see Orr v Mitchell (1893, A.C at p. 254). With regard to the stat......
-
Gurney v Gurney
...insisted that the gifts were void; they referred to the Wills Act, sect. 15, Wigan v. Rowland (23 Law Journ. 69), Emanuel v, Constable (3 Russ. 436). Mr. Bagshawe and Mr. Martindale, contra. The test is, whether the witness was competent when he attested (see Wyndham v. Chetwynd, lIBurr. 43......