Emerson v Hearty and Morgan
| Jurisdiction | Northern Ireland |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Northern Ireland) |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1946 |
| Date | 01 January 1946 |
(C.A., N.I.),
Emerson
and
Hearty and Morgan
Principles to be observed when drafting.
A case stated should be in paragraphs setting out the facts of the case, the contentions of the parties and the trial Judge's findings of fact and any inferences or conclusions of fact which he drew from the facts found by him.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
12 cases
-
Express Motor Assessors Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Revenue Commissioners
...back to allow those findings of fact to be made: Mitchelstown Co-Op Society v. Comr. for Valuation, applying Emerson v. Hearty and Morgan [1946] N.I. 35. This is because this Court has no jurisdiction to make such findings itself and can only determine matters of law. It is therefore a matt......
-
McGinley v Criminal Assets Bureau (Cab)
...WELFARE (AMDT) ACT 1997 S34 SOCIAL WELFARE (CONSOLIDATION) ACT 1993 S253(A) CRIMINAL ASSETS BUREAU ACT 1996 S14 EMERSON V HEARTY & MORGAN 1946 NI 35 MITCHELSTOWN CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY V COMMISSIONER FOR VALUATION 1989 IR 210 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT V FAIR EMPLOYMENT AGENCY 1989 NI 1......
-
Mitchelstown Co-Operative Society Ltd v Commissioner of Valuation
...findings of fact. So Held by Blayney J. in returning a case stated to the Valuation Tribunal for amendment. Emersonv. Hearty & MorganDNI [1946] N.I. 35 followed. Mitchelstown Co-Op Society v. Comr. for Valuation Mitchelstown Co-Operative Society Limited Appellant and The Commissioner for Va......
-
Martin O'Shea v West Wood Club Ltd and Others
... 1998 4 IR 67 1998 2 ILRM 129 1998/4/802 MITCHELSTOWN CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY v CMSR FOR VALUATION 1989 IR 210 EMERSON v HEARTY & MORGAN 1946 NI 35 AG v MCLOUGHLIN 1931 IR 480 BETTING DUTY REGS 1926 SI 65/1926 DPP v BUCKLEY UNREP CHARLETON 8.5.2007 2007/16/3400 2007 IEHC 150 DUBLIN CORP v ASH......
Get Started for Free