Emerson v Hearty and Morgan
| Jurisdiction | Northern Ireland |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1946 |
| Date | 01 January 1946 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Northern Ireland) |
(C.A., N.I.),
Emerson
and
Hearty and Morgan
Principles to be observed when drafting.
A case stated should be in paragraphs setting out the facts of the case, the contentions of the parties and the trial Judge's findings of fact and any inferences or conclusions of fact which he drew from the facts found by him.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
12 cases
-
McGinley v Criminal Assets Bureau (Cab)
...WELFARE (AMDT) ACT 1997 S34 SOCIAL WELFARE (CONSOLIDATION) ACT 1993 S253(A) CRIMINAL ASSETS BUREAU ACT 1996 S14 EMERSON V HEARTY & MORGAN 1946 NI 35 MITCHELSTOWN CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY V COMMISSIONER FOR VALUATION 1989 IR 210 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT V FAIR EMPLOYMENT AGENCY 1989 NI 1......
-
Mitchelstown Co-Operative Society Ltd v Commissioner of Valuation
...findings of fact. So Held by Blayney J. in returning a case stated to the Valuation Tribunal for amendment. Emersonv. Hearty & MorganDNI [1946] N.I. 35 followed. Mitchelstown Co-Op Society v. Comr. for Valuation Mitchelstown Co-Operative Society Limited Appellant and The Commissioner for Va......
-
Martin O'Shea v West Wood Club Ltd and Others
... 1998 4 IR 67 1998 2 ILRM 129 1998/4/802 MITCHELSTOWN CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY v CMSR FOR VALUATION 1989 IR 210 EMERSON v HEARTY & MORGAN 1946 NI 35 AG v MCLOUGHLIN 1931 IR 480 BETTING DUTY REGS 1926 SI 65/1926 DPP v BUCKLEY UNREP CHARLETON 8.5.2007 2007/16/3400 2007 IEHC 150 DUBLIN CORP v ASH......
-
The Child and Family Agency v L.B.
...[1989] I.R. 210. In the latter case, Blayney J. quoted Murphy L.J. in the Northern Ireland Court of Appeal in Emerson v. Hearty & Morgan [1946] N.I. 35 as follows:- ‘The Case should set out clearly the Judge's findings of fact, and should also set out any inferences or conclusions of fact w......
Get Started for Free