Ette v Ette

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
Year1964
Date1964

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
22 cases
  • Lee Puey Hwa v Tay Cheow Seng
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • July 8, 1991
    ...the husband as to his capacity or faculties and to treat him as a man in a position to command a very substantial income: Ette v Ette [1965] 1 All ER 341. The appellant contends, therefore, that the learned judge erred in not granting a lump sum in that he failed to give any weight, or suff......
  • McEwan v McEwan
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
    ... ... N. v. N. ( 1928 ) 44 T.L.R. 324 ; J. v. J. [ 1955 ] P. 215 , C.A. Klucinski v. Klucinski [ 1953 ] 1 W.L.R. 522 , D.C.; Ette v. Ette [ 1964 ] 1 W.L.R. 1433 and dictum of Willmer L.J. in Brett v. Brett [ 1969 ] 1 W.L.R. 487 , 490, C.A. applied ... The ... ...
  • Usha Rani a/p Subramaniam v Sivanes Rajaratnam
    • Malaysia
    • Unspecified court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Koh Kim Lan Angela v Choong Kian Haw and Another Appeal
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • November 17, 1993
    ... ... It is entitled to draw adverse inferences against the husband and to treat him as a man in a position to command a very substantial income: Ette v Ette , Lee Puey Hwa v Tay Cheow Seng , Wee Ah Lian v Teo Siak Weng ... Assessment of the wife`s share of the assets ... To assess her ... ...
  • Get Started for Free