Ette v Ette

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1964
Year1964
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
21 cases
  • Lee Puey Hwa v Tay Cheow Seng
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 8 Julio 1991
    ...the husband as to his capacity or faculties and to treat him as a man in a position to command a very substantial income: Ette v Ette [1965] 1 All ER 341. The appellant contends, therefore, that the learned judge erred in not granting a lump sum in that he failed to give any weight, or suff......
  • McEwan v McEwan
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • Usha Rani a/p Subramaniam v Sivanes Rajaratnam
    • Malaysia
    • Unspecified court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Koh Kim Lan Angela v Choong Kian Haw and Another Appeal
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 17 Noviembre 1993
    ... ... It is entitled to draw adverse inferences against the husband and to treat him as a man in a position to command a very substantial income: Ette v Ette , Lee Puey Hwa v Tay Cheow Seng , Wee Ah Lian v Teo Siak Weng ... Assessment of the wife`s share of the assets ... To assess her ... ...
  • Get Started for Free