European Asian Bank A.G. v Punjab and Sind Bank (Averilla)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1981 |
| Date | 1981 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 cases
-
National Iranian Oil Company v Ashland Overseas Trading Ltd
...Castaho v Brown & Root (UK) LtdELR [1981] AC 557 Sim v RobinowSC (1892) 19 R 665 European Asian Bank AG v Punjab and Sind BankUNK [1981] 2 Lloyds Rep. 651 The Abidin DaverELR [1984] AC 398 Coral IsisUNK [1986] 1 Lloyds Rep. 413 SNIAS v Lee Kul JakELR [1987] AC 872 The NordglintWLR [1988] 2 ......
-
Muduroglu Ltd v T. C. Ziraat Bankasi
...Scarman quoted the MacShannon formula, but went on to say that the formula should not be construed as a statute. 53 In European Asian Rank A.S. v. Punjab and Sind Bank [1982] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 356, both parties accepted Mr. Justice Robert Goff's formulation of the law, but Lord Justice Stephen......
-
Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex Ltd
...likely to occur in commercial disputes, where there can be pointers to a number of different jurisdictions (see, e.g., European Asian Bank A.G. v. Punjab and Sind Bank [1981] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 651), or in Admiralty, in the case of collisions on the high seas. I can see no reason why the Engli......
-
Bank of Tokyo Ltd v Karoon (Note)
...of higher damages.) The decision of the House of Lords in the Trendtex case was followed by the Court of Appeal in European Asian Bank A.G. v. Punjab and Sind Bank (1982) 2 Lloyd's Rep. 356. The principles in these two cases, derived from all the speeches of the House of Lords in MacShanno......
Request a trial to view additional results