European Ltd v Economist Newspaper Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Year | 1996 |
| Date | 1996 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
43 cases
-
The Polo/Lauren Company, LP v Shop-in Department Store Pte Ltd
...Sport [1998] RPC 199 (“Sabel”) and followed by the English Court of Appeal in The European Limited v The Economist Newspaper Limited [1998] FSR 283 (“The 13 The plaintiff submitted that the global assessment test should not be applied for a few reasons. Firstly, the approach is the result o......
- 10 Royal Berkshire Polo Club Trade Mark
-
Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) v Lee (t/a Cropton Brewery)
...to go quite that far because there are exceptional situations, but I note that in The European Ltd v The Economist Newspaper Ltd [1998] F.S.R. 283 at 290–291 Millett L.J., with whom Hobhouse and Otton L.JJ. agreed, considered that the evidence of trade witnesses who gave their opinion of th......
-
Robyn Rihanna Fenty and Others v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd (t/a Topshop) and Another
...in 1997 ( NAD Electronics v NAD Computer Systems [1997] FSR 380). 24 In 1998 the issue came before the Court of Appeal in The European v. The Economist [1998] FSR 283. Millett LJ said the following: "The evidence of confusion or no confusion consisted of (i) evidence of witnesses purporting......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
James & Wells wins High Court Appeal for Cambricare
...similar, they were not confusingly similar: a degree of similarity was tolerable (The European Limited v The Economist Newspaper Limited [1998] FSR 283 at 288 per Millett LJ). Consequently use of CAMBRICARE was not likely to deceive or confuse consumers. The Court's In the Court's decision,......
