Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd and Others (Secretary of State for Health Intervening); Hadley v Midland Fertility Services Ltd and Others

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date25 June 2004
Neutral Citation[2004] EWCA Civ 727
Date25 June 2004
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 cases
  • Re Termination of Pregnancy Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Northern Ireland)
    • 29 Junio 2017
    ...is lawful to protect the interests of the unborn child even at the point of birth. 106. In Evans v. Amicus Health Care Limited and Others[2005] Fam 1, Wall J reviewed all the authorities and said at paragraph 175: … there is abundant domestic authority, binding on me, that a foetus, at what......
  • ARB v Ivf Hammersmith Ltd R (Third Party)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 6 Octubre 2017
    ...the retention of embryos. Hale LJ held that the form should be treated as valid unless clearly demonstrated not to be. 224 In Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd [2005] Fam 1, embryos had been created and stored, each of the claimants wished to remove these from storage in order to have them impl......
  • The Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission’s Application
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Northern Ireland)
    • 30 Noviembre 2015
    ...4 EHRR 293, [1982] ECHR 7511/76, ECt HR. Dudgeon v UK (1981) 4 EHRR 149, [1981] ECHR 7525/76, ECt HR. Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd[2004] EWCA Civ 727, [2004] 2 FCR 530, [2004] 3 All ER 1025, [2005] Fam 1, [2004] 3 WLR 681, [2004] 2 FLR 766; affg[2003] EWHC 2161 (Fam), [2003] 3 FCR 577, [20......
  • Richard Holdich V. Lothian Health Board
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 19 Diciembre 2013
    ...the remedy is guaranteed to work only where the action lies against the cryostorers qua bailees [Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd & Ors [2004] 2 FLR 766 at § 88 per Arden LJ]. [51] What happens when the cryostore malfunction is caused, as senior counsel figures, by careless outside contractors......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 books & journal articles
  • Accommodating Children's Rights in a Post Human Rights Act Era
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 69-3, May 2006
    • 1 Mayo 2006
    ...I determine lies behind the recommendationswhich I have accepted’; Re S (speci¢c issue order: religion: circumcision) [2004] EWHC 1282(Fam)[2005] 1FLR 236. Baron J considered, with expert assistance, in [6]^[24] and appendix 1,the detailed di¡erences between Hindu Jainism and Islam.The chi ......
  • Judicial Responses to Bright Line Rules in Social Security: In Search of Principle
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 72-3, May 2009
    • 1 Mayo 2009
    ...Fertilisation and EmbryologyAct 1990,Sched 3 para 4.176 n 174 a b ov e , at [ 8 9 ].177 Evans vAmicusHealthcareLtd [2004] EWCACiv 727;[2004] 2 FLR 766 at [66] (Thorpe and SedleyLJJ).178 n 174 a b o ve a t [ 8 6] .179 [2008] UKHL15; [2008] 2 WLR781.Emma Laurie405r2009 The Author.Journal Comp......
  • Creating A Legal Market In Kidneys [...]
    • United Kingdom
    • SOAS Law Journal No. I-I, January 2014
    • 1 Enero 2014
    ...ibid. Muireann Quigley, ‘Property: The Future of Human Tissue?’ (2009) 17(3) Med Law Review 457. 142 Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 727. 143 Quigley (n 141). 144 Hecht v. Superior Court of Los Angeles Country, 16 Cal. App. 4th 836 (1993). 145 ibid. 146 Quigley (n 141) 461. 14......
  • Facts and evidence in litigation under the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic.) and the Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT).
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 36 No. 1, April 2012
    • 1 Abril 2012
    ...1 AC 247, 281 [61] (Lord Hope); R (Countryside Alliance) v A-G (UK) [2008] 1 AC 719, 765 [78] (Lord Hope); Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd [2004] 3 WLR 681, 699 [56] (Thorpe and Sedley LJJ); Sheldrake v DPP [2005] 1 AC 264, 297 [21] (Lord Bingham). See also R (Daly) v Secretary of State for t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT