Evans v Clayhope Properties Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1987
Year1987
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 cases
  • Serious Organised Crime Agency v Gale and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 July 2010
    ... ... had not provided any specific addresses for their business enterprises and many of the properties which they asserted they or JP owned. He stated the pattern and quantum of bankings into the Allied ... Neither counsel before us found any help in the two cases mentioned in the footnote ( Evans v Clayhope Properties [1988] 1 WLR 358 ; Maritime Transport v Unitramp (“The Antaios”) ... ...
  • Lewisham and Guys Mental Health NHS Trust v Andrews (Deceased)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 23 March 2000
    ...the Clerk shall pay the receiver's remuneration and expenses out of that sum. 39Unfortunately for us Vinelott J. in Evans v Clayhope [1987] 1 W.L.R. 225, 230 declined to express any opinion as to whether or not the remuneration and expenses incurred by the receiver could be treated as part......
  • Crown Prosecution Service v Eastenders Cash and Carry Plc and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 23 November 2012
    ... ... Mr David Perry QC and Mr Martin Evans (instructed by Peters & Peters Solicitors LLP) for 2 nd Respondent (former Receiver) ... citing Warrington J in Boehm v Goodall (and its endorsement by Nourse LJ in Evans v Clayhope Properties Ltd [1988] 1 WLR 358 , 362), stated at 1243: "That principle was ... ...
  • Capewell v HM Revenue and Customs
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 31 January 2007
    ...and managers over which they have no control." This passage was cited and applied by Vinelott J in Evans v Clayhope Properties Ltd. [1987] 1 WLR 225, 229-230 (upheld by the Court of Appeal [1988] 1 WLR 358, Nourse LJ, at p 363, sharing Vinelott J's doubts as to whether a receiver's remune......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT