Ex parte Central Independent Television Plc and Others

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date06 November 1990
Date06 November 1990
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 cases
  • Holden & Company v Crown Prosecution Service (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 October 1991
    ...save only by the rules of court. Is there then a discretion in this case to order costs out of central funds? 12 In Ex parte Central Television plc (1991) 1 W.L.R. the Crown Court had made an order under section 4 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981. The appellants exercised their right of ap......
  • M.G.N. Pension Trustees Ltd v Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 12 December 1994
    ...... made by the Serious Fraud Office and supported by others for an order under section 4(2) of the 1981 Act postponing ... v Clerkenwell Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, Ex parte The Telegraph plc and OthersELR((1993) QB 462, 469F-G). Mr ... had attracted some judicial support: see Ex parte Central Television plc and OthersWLR ((1991) 1 WLR 4, 7G) and R v ......
  • Re BBC
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 13 June 2018
    ...common ground that an appeal under section 159 can be made even after the reporting restriction order has been discharged: ex parte Central Independent Television [1991] 1 WLR 4, at 9E per Lord Lane CJ. The Criminal Proceedings 3 The defendant was a surgeon. He was charged with a single cou......
  • (first) The British Broadcasting Corporation; (second) Times Newspapers Limited; (third) News Group Newspapers Limited For Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 19 March 2020
    ...some less restrictive means. If so, it could not be said to be “necessary” to take the more drastic approach: Ex p Central Television plc [1991] 1 WLR 4, 8D–G, per Lord Lane CJ. (iii) If the judge is satisfied that there is indeed no other way of eliminating the perceived risk of prejudice,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT