Ex parte Coates. Re Skelton
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1876 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
Gladney v Tobin
...endorsement, of a number of decisions of the Courts of England and Wales, which I shall discuss briefly. 35 In re Skelton ex p Coates (1877) 5 Ch D 979 did not involve any alleged overstatement of the debt due to the petitioning creditor. Rather, the issue was the failure to allege in the p......
-
Minister for Communications, Energy & Natural Resources v Michael Wymes (a bankrupt)
...of Hamilton P. in O'Maoileoin v. Official Assignee [1989] I.R. 647 who, in turn, quoted Bacon C.J. in In re. Skelton, ex-parte Coates 5 Ch. D 979: “… It is the very gist and essence of the Bankruptcy Act creditors… cannot have the benefit unless they strictly comply with the terms of the A......
-
Patrick Murphy v Governor and Company of Bank of Ireland and Others
...which such an outcome could be achieved, as being one which requires strict compliance. Bacon C.J., in Ex Parte Coates. In re Skelton (1877) 5 Ch. D. 979 ("In re Skelton") gave as a reason that (p. 980): "[i]t is the very gist and essence of the Bankruptcy Act that creditors who claim the b......
-
Michael Gladney v John Tobin
...amount owed. He notes that the requirement for a Petitioner to state on the summons the amount due dates back to at least 1877 in In re Skelton, ex parte Coates (1877) 5 Ch. D. 979. This age-old principle has stood the test of time. On a number of more recent occasions, the courts, and this......
Request a trial to view additional results