Ex parte Ford. Re Caughey
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Date | 1875 |
| Year | 1875 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
10 cases
-
Re Clark. ex parte Beardmore
... ... Ex parte Ford (1 Ch. D. 521) followed ... Cohen v. Mitchell (25 Q. B. D. 262) explained and distinguished ... APPEAL by creditors in the second bankruptcy ... ...
-
Re Ball
...& C. 293. Evans v. Brown Ib. 170. Ex parte Ansell 19 Ves. 208. Ex parte Dewhurst; In re VanloheELR L. R. 7 Ch. App. 185. Ex parte FordELR 1 Ch. D. 521. Ex parte ProudfootENR 1 Atk. 253. Ex parte Rabbige: In re PooleyELR 8 Ch. D. 367. Ex parte WatsonELR 12 Ch. D. 380. Fowler v. DownUNK 1 B. ......
-
Zelee (Bahamas) Development Ltd v Ocl Investments Ltd
...case the purchasers remedy is in damages but he is not entitled to rescind the contract and recover his deposit. Shepherd v. Croft (1911) 1 Ch. D. 521; Re Brewer and Hankins' Contract 80 LT 127 and Re Belcham, and Gawley's Contract (1930) 1 Ch. D. 56. 26 Additionally, if the contract contai......
-
Utopia Vakansie-Oorde Bpk v Du Plessis
...die saak van In re New Chinese Antimony Co. Ltd., (1916) 2 Ch.D. 115, gevolg. Die Regter het die saak van In re W. J. Hall & Co., (1909) 1 Ch.D. 521, gevolg in soverre dit beslis het dat daar agterstallige voorkeurdiwidend kon wees sonder dat daar enige verklaring van diwidend plaasgevind h......
Get Started for Free
