Ex parte Wilson, and ex parte Bradshaw
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | High Court of Chancery |
| Judgment Date | 22 January 1752 |
| Date | 22 January 1752 |
English Reports Citation: 26 E.R. 140
HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY
Ex parte Wilson, and Ex parte Bradshaw
[217, 218] Case 119.-Ex parte wilson, and Ex parte bradshaw. January t 1752. Bankers having taken upon them to act as scriveners, made it necessary for the legislature in the 5 Geo. 2, to add bankers, as being liable to commissions of bankruptcy. -A person acting as banker, will be considered as one, tho' he does not keep an open shop. Lord Chancellor. The clause in 5 Geo. 2, relating to dealers as bankers, &c., took it's rise from that part of the 21 Jac. 1...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
Re Shields' Estate
...Eq. p. 693. De Robeck v. Cloncurry I. R. 5 Eq. 588. Ex parte Coe 3 De Gex F. & J. 338. Ex parte Coe 3 DeG. F. & J. 335. Ex parte WilsonENR 1 Atk. 217. Foley v. Hill 2 H. L. Cas. 28. Goodwin v. RobartsELR L.R. 10 Ex. 337,351. Guinness' Case 1 Ir. Jur. 359. Hayden v. CarrollENR 2 Ridg. 545. H......
-
Lott and Pidgeon, Assignees of Smark, a Bankrupt v Melville, Sharpe, and Todd
...entrusted with the custody of the money (a)2. (a)1 Vide Sandys v. Sandys, 1 A. & E. New Series, 316, n. (a)2 And see Wilson, Ex parte, 1 Atk. 217; Hankey v. Jones, Cowp. 745; Willett v. Chambers, ib. 814; Hamson v. Harrison, 1 Esp. N. P. C. 556; Hutchinson v. Gfascoigne, 1 Holt, N. P. C......
-
Hughes v Morley
...Lord Hardwicke says, " a scrivener comes within the meaning of the words bankers, brokers, arid factors, used in 5 Geo II " In ex parte Wilson, 1 Atk. 217, the same authority says, " a scrivener does not keep an open shop ; and yet, as he receives money belonging to other people, and places......
