Excelsior Wire Rope Company Ltd v Callan

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date06 February 1930
Judgment citation (vLex)[1930] UKHL J0206-1
CourtHouse of Lords
Date06 February 1930

[1930] UKHL J0206-1

House of Lords

Excelsior Wire Rope Company, Limited
and
Callan and Others.
1

After hearing Counsel for the Appellants, as well on Tuesday the 4th day of this instant February as this day, upon the Petition and Appeal of Excelsior Wire Rope Company, Limited, whose registered office is situate at North Road, Maindy, Cardiff, in the County of Glamorgan, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of His Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 12th of November 1928, might be reviewed before His Majesty the King, in His Court of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • Munnings v Hydro-Electric Commission
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Draper v Hodder
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 3 February 1972
    ...by way of precaution". 76In passing I would mention that the references in the actualreport from which I have just quoted to Excelsior Wire Rope Co. v. Callan is an obvious error for a references to Fardon v. Harcourt-Rivington and I have amended the quotation 77Thus, as I think, within a y......
  • British Railways Board v Herrington
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 16 February 1972
    ...narrower limits than had been customary. 11Later cases can hardly be said to exhibit loyal acceptance of the Addie doctrine. In Excelsior Wire Rope Co. v. Callan [1930] A.C. 404 this House giving extempore judgments dismissed an appeal by the occupier without hearing the Respondent. There ......
  • British Railways Board v Herrington
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 2 December 1970
    ...servants could, in the circumstances of that case, be regarded as other than reckless. Strangely enough, a year later,in Excelsior Wire Rope Co. v. Callan & Others (1930 Appeal Cases 404), Viscount Dunedin (who was a party to the decision in Addie's case) concluded that the defendants' ser......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT