EXPLORING CONTRACT LAW. Ed by Jason W Neyers, Richard Bronaugh and Stephen G A Pitel. Oxford: Hart Publishing (www.hartpub.co.uk), 2009. xix + 442 pp. ISBN 9781841139067. £75.

DOI10.3366/elr.2011.0012
Date01 January 2011
Published date01 January 2011
AuthorLaura Macgregor
Pages151-153

The essays in this collection are based on papers delivered at a symposium entitled “Exploring Contract Law” held at the University of Western Ontario in January 2008. The editors describe the conference as involving “ …good intellectual punch-ups” (v). The pugilists in question were “those who see law as an adjectival study focused on the work of the courts and commerce, and others who dedicate their careers to more philosophical musings about legal concepts” (v).

The brief given to the participants was a wide one: the presenters were asked to explore contract law in one of three ways: “[f]irst, they could (re)explore doctrines that are considered tangential or antiquated … Second, they could explore what appeared to be settled principles in light of recent case law developments … Third, they could explore black letter contract law from a theoretical or comparative perspective” (xi). Given this wide brief, not surprisingly the collection varies in subject matter and approach. The book does not disappoint, providing much food for thought on the Common Law approach to both substantive contract law and theories of contract law.

Particular highlights for this reader include the essay contributed by Robert Stevens, “Damages and the Right to Performance: A Golden Victory or Not?” This excellent essay considers the law of damages in the aftermath of the House of Lords decision, Golden Strait Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kubishika Kaisha (The Golden Victory) [2007] 2 AC 353 (HL). Using amusing (and highly personal) examples, Stevens nicely illustrates the fact that the calculation of damages is an art rather than a science: “there is too much law to the contrary for it to be seriously argued that the law of damages for breach of contract is solely concerned with compensating losses (or stripping of gains)” (198). His analysis of this issue in the context of different commercial contracts is particularly valuable. Charlie Webb continues this theme in a thought-provoking essay concerning the idea of a loss. One is struck by the fact that some contract cases continue to prove problematic, long after the date of decision, Wrotham Park Estate Co Ltd v Parkside Homes Ltd [1974] 1 WLR 798 being a case in point. The Scots reader will also notice immediately the areas where the arguments do not apply to Scots law, primarily where the primacy of the remedy of damages rather than specific implement is under discussion.

Steven Smith's opening essay, “The Limits of Contract”...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT