F. v F. (Duxbury Calculation: Rate of Return)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1996 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Wells v Wells
... ... conventional approach of awarding a multiplier consistent with a return of 4–5% per annum on the capital sum, and fixed the multiplier by ... court made for the purposes of this section, take into account such rate of return (if any) as may from time to time be prescribed by an order made ... and in particular that the life expectancy from which the calculation starts may be falsified in the event by supervening illness or accident ... 110 Finally in this part of our judgment, we wish to mention the Duxbury Tables and the publication issued by the Family Bar Association entitled ... ...
-
Ar v Ar (Ancillary Relief: Inheritance)
...a simple Duxbury calculation. She points to references to Duxbury being a tool or guide, not a rule or rigid formula. She has referred me to F v F [1996] 1 FLR 833; McCartney v Mills McCartney [2008] 1 FLR 1508; and my own decision of B v B [2010] 2 FLR 1214. She submits that the authorit......
-
Dharamshi v Dharamshi
...already sufficiently esoteric without disputing or discarding what was aptly described as 'the industry standard' by Holman J in F v F [1996] 1 FLR 833. 13 But the calculation of the wife's reasonable income requirements as a means of determining her award has been expressly and emphaticall......
-
H v H
...to embark on such a process. That must be a matter for others. What I do take on board is the wise warning given by Holman J in F v F (Duxbury Calculation) [1996] 1 FLR 833 at 849 where he rejected on the facts of that case rates of return above and below the then Duxbury assumed rate for t......
Request a trial to view additional results