Fakih Brothers v A. P. Moller (Copenhagen) Ltd
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1994 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Walton International Ltd v Verweij Fashion BV
...Court retained jurisdiction over the Claimants with respect to the counterclaim even if they discontinued the claim: see Fakih Brothers v A P Moller (Copenhagen) Ltd [1994] 1 Lloyds Rep 103 at 109 (Hobhouse J), Glencore International AG v Exter Shipping Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 524, [2002] CLC......
-
Sheltam Rail Company (Proprietary) Ltd v Mirambo Holdings Ltd and another
...had been required, would the court have granted it unconditionally or on terms? That test was adopted by Hobhouse J in Fakih Bros. v AP Moller (Copenhagen) Ltd [1994] 1 Lloyds Rep. 103 at 109. In Ernst & Young v Butte Mining Plc [1996] 1 WLR 1605Robert Walker J recognised that this test mig......
-
The High Commissioner for Pakistan in the United Kingdom v National Westminster Bank Plc (Defendant/Applicant) Prince Mukkaram Jah, His Exalted Highness the 8th Nizam of Hyderabad Prince Muffakham Jah and Another The Union of India and Another
...case law. 43 I was referred to a number of pre-CPR cases in which the principle established by Castanho v Brown & Root was applied. In Fakih Bros v Moller [1994] 1 Lloyd's Rep 103, Hobhouse J at 109 derived five principles from Lord Scarman's speech in Castanho v Brown & Root, of which I wi......
-
Ernst & Young (A Firm) v Butte Mining Plc
...3 Did such service by Barlow Lyde & Gilbert amount to an abuse of process? In Fakih Brothers v A P Moller (Copenhagen) LtdUNK ([1994] 1 Lloyd's Rep 103, 109) Mr Justice Hobhouse had said that in considering that issue one must have regard to the overall position between the parties and what......
Request a trial to view additional results