Fane v Fane

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1875
Year1875
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Pillar Resource Services Inc. v PrimeWest Energy Inc, 2017 ABCA 19
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 20 January 2017
    ...Banking Corp., [2009] NZCA 234, ¶ 29; [2009] 3 N.Z.L.R. 400, 410 (the Court adopted the Colgate-Palmolive protocol) & Fane v. Fane, 13 Ch. Div. 228, 231 (1879) (“The claim [gross breach of trust] must have caused the greatest anxiety to the Defendant ... has been abandoned, and it is a ......
  • Forster v Forster
    • Ireland
    • Chancery Division (Ireland)
    • 21 February 1917
    ... ... Naylor, Benzon & Company ( 18 ); Earl Beauchamp v. Winn ( 19 ); Daniell v. Sinclair ( 20 ); Fane v. Fane ( 21 ); Stewart v. Stewart ( 22 ); Walker v. Symonds ( 23 ). Rosenthal K.C. and Byrne , for the defendant:— The ... ...
  • Whitmore v O'Reilly
    • Ireland
    • King's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 27 February 1906
    ...B. 756. (2) 72 L. J. (N. S.) K. B. 152. (3) 20 L. R. Ir. 582, 590. (4) 39 Ir. L. T. R. 241. (5) 18 L. R. Ir. 40. (6) 4 Q. B. D. 611. (7) 13 Ch. D. 228. (8) [1899] 2 Ch. 467. (9) 6 L. R. Ir. 155. (1) 5. Times L. R. 42. (1) 4 Q. B. D. 611. (2) 55 L. J. (N. S.) Q. B. 566. (1) [1892] 2 Ch. 134.......
  • Habib Bank Limited, Singapore v The Bank of East Asia Limited & Anor
    • Singapore
    • District Court (Singapore)
    • 18 February 2002
    ...cause of action. 31. This discretion extends to the power to award costs even as against the successful party: e.g. see Fane v Fane (1879) 13 Ch D 228. Again in Halsbury’s Laws of England 4th ed. Vol. 37 at paragraph 717, the learned authors noted as follows: In the exercise of the court’s ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT