Fardon v Harcourt-Rivington
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Judgment Date | 22 January 1932 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1932] UKHL J0122-1 |
| Date | 22 January 1932 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
90 cases
- Chu Kim Sing and Another v Abd Razak Amin
- Re Hillman Minx No Su 3503
-
Ong Bee Nah v Won Siew Wan (Yong Tian Choy, Third Party)
...(1983) 150 DLR (3d) 249 (folld) Demeter v British Pacific Life Insurance Co (1984) 13 DLR (4th) 318 (folld) Fardon v Harcourt-Rivington (1932) 146 LT 391 (folld) Goody v Odhams Press Ltd [1967] 1 QB 333 (refd) Hollington v F Hewthorn and Company, Limited [1943] 1 KB 587 (not folld) Hopwood ......
- Jag Singh v Toong Fong Omnibus Company Ltd
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Tort Law
...Macmillan”s formulation of the duty of care owed by members of the public in the use of public highways in Fardon v Harcourt-Rivington(1932) 146 LT 391 at 392. In Fardon, Lord Macmillan had said: “Members of the public, motor owners, and pedestrians alike, in their use of the highway, owe t......
