Fardon v Harcourt-Rivington
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 22 January 1932 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1932] UKHL J0122-1 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 22 January 1932 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
150 cases
- Chu Kim Sing and Another v Abd Razak Amin
-
Ong Bee Nah v Won Siew Wan (Yong Tian Choy, Third Party)
...(1983) 150 DLR (3d) 249 (folld) Demeter v British Pacific Life Insurance Co (1984) 13 DLR (4th) 318 (folld) Fardon v Harcourt-Rivington (1932) 146 LT 391 (folld) Goody v Odhams Press Ltd [1967] 1 QB 333 (refd) Hollington v F Hewthorn and Company, Limited [1943] 1 KB 587 (not folld) Hopwood ......
- Re Hillman Minx No Su 3503
- Chan Kian Wah and Another; Tan Kia Chee and Others
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...95 Fardon v. Hardon-Rivington, [1932] All E.R. Rep. 81, 146 L.T. 391, 48 T.L.R. 215, 76 Sol. J. 81 (H.L.).................................................................... 9 Ferguson v. McBee Technographics Inc., [1988] 6 W.W.R. 716, 55 Man. R. (2d) 130, 23 C.P.R. (3d) 47, additional reas......
-
Tort Law
...Macmillan”s formulation of the duty of care owed by members of the public in the use of public highways in Fardon v Harcourt-Rivington(1932) 146 LT 391 at 392. In Fardon, Lord Macmillan had said: “Members of the public, motor owners, and pedestrians alike, in their use of the highway, owe t......