Fecitt and Others v NHS Manchester

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
Neutral CitationUKEAT/0150/10 CEA
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Dr Kevin Beatt v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 23 May 2017
  • Fecitt and Others v NHS Manchester
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 October 2011
    ...THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM the EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL HHJ SEROTA QC, Professor S R Corby and Mr I Ezekiel UKEAT/0150/10/CEA Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Lord Justice Mummery Lord Justice Elias Lord Justice Davis Case No: A2/2010/2919/EATRF Be......
  • Arriva London South Ltd v Nicolaou
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Appeal Tribunal
    • Invalid date
  • Mr Ibrar Hussain v Little Rainbow Nursery Ltd: 3201826/2017
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 12 December 2018
    ...show the ground on which any act or deliberate failure to act was done" 19. The causation test is set out in Fecitt v NHS Manchester [2011] ICR 476 requires that the protected act materially influence (in the sense of being more than a trivial influence) the employer’s treatment of the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Outside the Equality Act
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Discrimination and the Law Nbr. 15-4, December 2015
    • 1 December 2015
    ...v. NHS Manchester [2012] ICR 372 reversing the EAT on thispoint.37. Via Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013, sections 17–19.38. [2011] ICR 476.39. Ibid., [47], [64]. The CA upheld the earlier instances regarding the similarity to discriminationregarding causation.40. Human Rights Act ......
  • Whistle-blowing and the equality dimension of victimisation in the workplace
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Discrimination and the Law Nbr. 17-2, June 2017
    • 1 June 2017
    ...this provision it was not necessary to prove that reprisal was the employer’s motiveor intention.60. NHS Manchester v. Fecitt and others [2011] IRLR 111.61. Under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010.62. NHS Manchester v. Fecitt and others [2011] EWCA Civ 1190 CA.63. R. Kohasnzad, “The Burde......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT