Ferguson et Al v Wallbridge et Al
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1933 |
| Date | 1933 |
| Year | 1933 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
22 cases
-
The Companies Law (2013 Revision) the Sphinx Group of Companies in Official Liquidation)
...was brought by the liquidator in the name of the company.’ 42 Walton J. recognized the clear pronouncements of the Privy Council in Ferguson v Wallbridge [1935] 3 D.L.R. 66 as to the vast distinction between the position where the company is a going concern and a minority shareholder deriva......
- Perak Integrated Network Services Sdn Bhd v Urban Domain Sdn Bhd and Another
-
Suzy Belinda Hughes v Nigel Richard Weiss and Another
...business of the company was best left to the judgment of an independent liquidator. Peter Gibson LJ relied on two other decisions ( Ferguson v Wallbridge [1935] 3 DLR 66, PC; Fargro Ltd v Godfroy (1986) 2 BCC 99,162) in which derivative actions failed because there was a liquidator who was ......
-
Mrs Lakshmi Konamaneni and Others v Rolls Royce Industrial Power (India) Ltd and Others
...was best left to the judgment of an independent liquidator. Peter Gibson LJ relied on two other decisions ( Ferguson v. Wallbridge [1935] 3 DLR 66, P.C.; Fargro Ltd v Godfroy [1986] 1 WLR 1134) in which derivative actions failed because there was a liquidator who was in a position to take a......
Request a trial to view additional results