Fielding v Seery

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date2004
Year2004
CourtChancery Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
22 cases
  • National Westminster Bank Plc v (1) Msaada Group (A Firm) (2) Gary Steven Pettit and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • December 21, 2011
    ...But this concern does not bring the case anywhere near the sort of conflict which was of concern to HH Judge Maddocks in Fielding v Seery [2004] BCC 315, referred to by Lewison J in ( Re Med-Gourmet Restaurants Ltd unreported 15 October 2010). I attach very little weight indeed to it. I see......
  • Weston v Dayman
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • October 25, 2005
  • Agritrade Resources Ltd
    • Bermuda
    • Supreme Court (Bermuda)
    • June 17, 2020
    ...claims or whose conduct in relation to the affairs of the company is under investigation (HH Judge Maddocks in Fieldings v Seery [2004] BCC 315 Ch D [33], cited with approval in Re Opus Offshore Limited [2017] Bda LR 14 at [67]). (c) A liquidator is not only required to act impartially but ......
  • BTI 2014 LLC v Finbarr O'Connell
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • August 7, 2025
    ...should not be the choice of a person who has a duty or purpose which conflicts with the duties of the officeholder: Fielding v Seery [2004] BCC 315 at [33], in particular [33](4); Raithatha v Holstein GmbH [2017] EWHC 3069 (Ch) at [26], [45], [53]. (ii) The officeholder should not be the no......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries