Fisher v Keane

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Year1878
Date1878

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
17 cases
  • O'Callaghan v O'Sullivan
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court (Irish Free State)
    • 31 March 1925
    ...to be applicable, no case of want of notice had been established. Shawv. Attorney-General,ELR L. R. 2 P. & D. 156; Fisher v. Keane,ELR 11 Ch. D. 353; and Rex v. Cambridge University, 1 Stra. 557, distinguished. S. C., O'Callaghan and O'Sullivan Parish Priest removed by Bishop-Contractual re......
  • John v Rees
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... 325 ... Cockburn v. Thompson ( 1809 ) 16 Ves. 321 ... Finch v. Oake [ 1896 ] 1 Ch. 409 , C.A ... Fisher v. Keane ( 1878 ) 11 Ch.D. 353 ... Fountaine v. Chesterton ( 1968 ) The Times, August 20 , 1968; 112 Sol.J. 690 ... Fraser v ... ...
  • Ridge v Baldwin
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • Invalid date
    ... ... The following authorities, besides those referred to in their Lordships' opinions, were cited in argument: Fisher v. Oldham Corporation F1 ; Rex v. Hendon Rural District Council, Ex parte Chorley F2 ; Reg. v. Manchester Legal Aid Committee F3 ; General Medical ... Then there are the club cases Fisher v. Keane F67 and Dawkins v. Antrobus. F68 In the former, Jessel M.R. said of the committee F69 : ... “They ought not, as I understand it, according to ... ...
  • Norwest Holst Ltd v Secretary of State for Trade
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 1 February 1978
    ...a hint of nostalgia for the good old days when nasty things did not happen. If, instead, we omit it and put the question in the form of Fisher v. Keane (1879) 11 Chancery Division 353, "Have the ordinary principles of justice been complied with?", it at once becomes much more realistic and ......
  • Get Started for Free