Flitters v Allfrey
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1865 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
-
Kelly v Ireland
...(ADMINISTRATION) ACT 1924 S9 CRIPPEN 1911 P108 DPP V HUMPHRYS 1976 2 AER 497 DUBLIN CORPORATION V FLYNN 1980 IR 357 FLITTERS V ALLFREY LR 10 CP 29 HOLLINGTON V HEWTHORN 1943 KB 587 HOYSTEAD V COMMIS OF TAXATION 1926 AC 155 HUNTER V CHIEF CONSTABLE OF WEST MIDLANDS 1981 3 AER 727, 1982 A......
-
R v Queen's County Justices
... ... Hislop (2) ; Poyser v. Minors (3) ; Flitters v. Allfrey (4) ; Hume v. Burton (5) ; Wakefield Corporation v. Cooke (6) ; Irish Land Commission v. Ryan (7) ; The Queen v. Farmer (8) ; The ... ...
-
Seele Austria GmbH & Company v Tokio Marine Europe Insurance Ltd
...( Brunsden v Humphrey [1884] 14 QBD 141, CA)and if necessary other material to show what was the issue decided ( Flitters v Allfrey LR 10 CP 29). The fact that the pleadings and the evidence maybe referred to, suggest that the task of the court in subsequent proceedings must include that of......
-
Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd and Others (Original Appeal) and Rayner & Keeler Ltd and Others v Courts and Others (Cross Appeal)
...evidence ( Brunsden v. Humphrey 14 Q.B.D. 141) and if necessary other material to show what was the issue decided ( Flitters v. Allfrey L.R. 10 C.P. 29). The fact that the pleadings and the evidence may be referred to, suggests that the task of the court in the subsequent proceeding must in......
Request a trial to view additional results