Forbes v Wandsworth Health Authority
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Judgment Date | 14 March 1996 |
| Date | 14 March 1996 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
98 cases
-
McGhie v British Telecommunications Plc
... ... cogent medical evidence showing a serious effect on the claimant's health or enjoyment of life and employability. The likely amount of an award is ... that the judge did not, as he was urged to do by counsel, and as authority requires, address the strength of the claim on liability ... Mr Leech refers to another judgment of Stuart-Smith LJ in Forbes v Wandsworth Health Authority [1997] QB 402 , the passage being at ... ...
-
Gough v Neary & Cronin
...LIMITATIONS (AMDT) ACT 1991 S2(1)(A) LIMITATION ACT 1975 (UK) NASH V ELI LILLY & CO 1993 1 WLR 782 FORBES V WANDWORTH HEALTH AUTHORITY 1996 3 WLR 1108 SPARGO V NORTH ESSEX DISTRICT HEALTH AUTHORITY 37 BMLR 99 SNIEZEK V BUNDY (LETCHWORTH) LTD [2000] PIQR 213 CHAPLIN V MOSS UNREP 17.7.2001 ......
-
O'Sullivan v Ireland
...unnecessary and negligent. 17 Geoghegan J. expressly approved a number of passages from the English cases. In Forbes v Wandsworth HA [1997] QB 402, Stuart-Smith LJ at p. 411 said: 'In many medical negligence cases the plaintiff will not know that his injury is attributable to the omission o......
-
O'Sullivan v Ireland, the Attorney General
...which was reasonably available and which would have shown that nerve damage had been caused. In Forbes v Wandsworth Health Authority [1997] QB 402, the plaintiff had a leg amputated. Time did not begin to run from that event but, instead, from the time when he had reasonably obtained exper......
Get Started for Free