Forbes v Wandsworth Health Authority
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 14 March 1996 |
Date | 14 March 1996 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
102 cases
-
McGhie v British Telecommunications Plc
...that it is relevant to consider the strength of Mr McGhie's case. Mr Leech refers to another judgment of Stuart-Smith LJ in Forbes v Wandsworth Health Authority [1997] QB 402, the passage being at 417–418. Stuart-Smith LJ there said that a relevant consideration to the exercise of the discr......
-
O'Sullivan v Ireland, the Attorney General
...which was reasonably available and which would have shown that nerve damage had been caused. In Forbes v Wandsworth Health Authority [1997] QB 402, the plaintiff had a leg amputated. Time did not begin to run from that event but, instead, from the time when he had reasonably obtained exper......
-
Gough v Neary & Cronin
...LIMITATIONS (AMDT) ACT 1991 S2(1)(A) LIMITATION ACT 1975 (UK) NASH V ELI LILLY & CO 1993 1 WLR 782 FORBES V WANDWORTH HEALTH AUTHORITY 1996 3 WLR 1108 SPARGO V NORTH ESSEX DISTRICT HEALTH AUTHORITY 37 BMLR 99 SNIEZEK V BUNDY (LETCHWORTH) LTD [2000] PIQR 213 CHAPLIN V MOSS UNREP 17.7.2001 ......
-
Jeffrey Jones and Others v The Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (First Defendant) Coal Products Ltd (Second Defendant)
...case about dyslexia), Lord Hoffmann endorsed the "reasonable curiosity" test which had been applied by the Court of Appeal in Forbes v Wandsworth Health Authority282. At paragraph 43, he stated: "… [in losing his leg, the claimant] thought he had simply suffered a misfortune. Stuart-Smith L......
Request a trial to view additional results