Ford's Hotel Company, Ltd, v Bartlett
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 02 December 1895 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1895] UKHL J1202-1 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 02 December 1895 |
[1895] UKHL J1202-1
House of Lords
After hearing Counsel for the Appellants, as well on Friday last as this day, upon the Petition and Appeal of Ford's Hotel Company, Limited, of 14, Manchester - street, Manchester - square, Loudon, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal of the 9th of April 1895, might be reviewed before Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioners might have such other relief in the premises as to Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament might seem meet; as also upon the printed Case of Herbert Henry Bartlett (trading as Perry & Co.), lodged in answer to the said Appeal; (in which said Appeal the questions of the admissibility of certain documents included in the Appendix, and of the costs of the Petition of the Respondent, relating thereto, presented on the 20th day of June last, were, by an Order of this House of the 5th day of July last, reserved to the hearing of the Appeal at the Bar), and Counsel appearing for the Respondent, but not called on; and due consideration had of what was offered for the Appellants:
It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, in the Court of Parliament of Her Majesty the Queen assembled, That the said Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 9th of April 1895, complained of in the said Appeal, be, and the same is hereby...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
(1) Bilta (UK) Ltd ((in Liquidation)) (2) Kevin John Hellard (liquidator of Bilta (UK)Ltd) and Another v (1) Muhammad Nazir and Another (3) Pan 1 Ltd and Others
...substantive claim falling within section 9(3) of the 1996 Act. He relies, in particular, on the old case of Ford's Hotel Co Ltd v Bartlett [1896] AC 1, which concerned the phrase “step in the proceedings” in section 4 of the Arbitration Act 1889 (which was in similar terms to section 4 of t......
-
Go Go Delicacy Pte Ltd v Carona Holdings Pte Ltd and Others
...of Confederation Buildings Trust v Pigott Construction Co Ltd (1974) 44 DLR (3d) 265 (refd) Ford's Hotel Company, Limited v Bartlett [1896] AC 1 (distd) Global Multimedia International Ltd v Ara Media Services [2007] 1 All ER (Comm) 1160 (refd) Halvanon Insurance Co Ltd v Companhia de Segur......
-
Furey and Another v Lurganville Construction Company Ltd & Others
... ... ARBITRATION ACT 1980 S5 HALSBURYS LAWS OF ENGLAND 4ED REISSUE VOL 2 627 FORDS HOTEL COMPANY LTD v BARTLETT 1896 AC 1 BRIGHTON MARINE PALACE & PIER LTD v WOODHOUSE 1893 2 ... ...
-
Go Go Delicacy Pte Ltd v Carona Holdings Pte Ltd and Others
...Kee Construction Trading Co v IEC Global Pte Ltd [2003] 4 SLR (R) 499; [2003] 4 SLR 499 (refd) Ford's Hotel Company, Limited v Bartlett [1896] AC 1 (refd) Go Go Delicacy Pte Ltd v Carona Holdings Pte Ltd [2007] SGHC 97 (refd) Jarguh Sawit, The [1997] 3 SLR (R) 829; [1998] 1 SLR 648 (refd) S......
-
Civil Procedure
...and Hotels, Limited v Knowles[1902] 1 KB 480; Williams v The Society of Lloyd”s[1994] 1 VR 274; Ford”s Hotel Company, Limited v Bartlett[1896] AC 1). The reason is that the difference between a step in the proceedings which is essential to the defendant and one which is not essential to him......