Foster v Foster

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1953
Year1953
CourtDivisional Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Bright v Bright
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
  • Cooper v Cooper (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • Ogden v Ogden
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • Thoday v Thoday
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 19 December 1963
    ...I think it useful also to refer to the two Divisional Court cases to which we have been referred in the course of the argument, namely, Foster v. Foster (1954) Probate 67, and Cooper v. Cooper, (1955) Probate 168, both of which seem to me to proceed upon the same principle. 14 Fourthly, how......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Rethinking Agency: A Phenomenological Approach to Embodiment and Agentic Capacities
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Political Studies No. 53-1, March 2005
    • 1 March 2005
    ...mute protest in his bones, an instinctive sense that conditions are intolerable;a visceral revulsion against the ugliness of life (Orwell, 1954, p. 67). For the phenomenologist, however, such corporeal reactions cannot simply be des-ignated instinctual. They are lived ways of responding to ......
  • Cross‐Section Production Functions and Income ‐ Shares in South African Industry
    • South Africa
    • Wiley South African Journal of Economics No. 41-3, September 1973
    • 1 September 1973
    ...in the Union of South Africa, in Monopoly and Competition and theirRegulation, Ed. by Edward Chamberlin, IEA, Macmillan, London, 1954, p. 67. Steenkamp excludes from his statement "competitionfrom overseas". It should be noted, however, that protective tariffs for locally produced products ......