Fowler v Knoop

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date10 December 1878
Date10 December 1878
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Tradigrain S.A. v King Diamond Shipping S.A. (Spiros C)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 13 July 2000
    ...distinct from shippers. Nevertheless, the judge accepted the owner's alternative submission that the court of appeal decision in Fowler v. Knoop (1878) 4 QBD 299 was determinative in imposing upon a shipper an implied term to discharge and to do so within a reasonable time. He reasoned as f......
  • Bristol Steam Navigation Company Ltd v Indemnity Mutual Marine Insurance Company
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 23 June 1887
    ...(a) Reported by Henry Leigh. Esq., Barrister-at-Law. 174 MARITIME LAW CASESPitman v. Universal Marine Insurance CompanyDID=ASPMELRUNK 46 L. T. Rep. N. S. 863 4 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 68 9 Q. B. Div. 192 51 L. J. 561, Q. B. 30 W. R. 906 Marine insurance Partial loss Owner altering an obsolete sh......
  • Tradigrain SA v King Diamond Shipping SA [QBD (Comm)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 27 April 1999
    ...v Holborn Oil Trading Ltd (“The Miramar”)ELRMiramar Maritime Corp v Holborn Oil Trading Ltd (“The Miramar”)ELR[1984] 1 AC 676andFowler v KnoopELR(1878) 4 QBD 299applied.) The following cases were referred to in the judgment: Fowler v KnoopELR (1878) 4 QBD 299 Heidberg, TheUNK [1994] 2 Ll Re......
  • Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corporation [QBD (Admiralty)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Admiralty)
    • 26 May 1995
    ...Co Ltd v Percy Dalton LtdELR [1957] 2 QB 621. Eleftheria, TheELR [1970] P 94. Ellrine Bros Ltd v ClingerWLR [1981] 1 WLR 1375. Fowler v KnoopELR (1878) 4 QBD 299. Hanak v GreenELR [1958] 2 QB 9. Hayter v Nelson & AnorUNK [1990] 2 Ll Rep 265. National Mercantile Bank Ltd v Rymill (1881) ......