Fox v General Medical Council

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1960
Date1960
Year1960
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
89 cases
  • Public Prosecutor v Dato' Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim (No. 3)
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1999
  • Dr. Emmanuel Dibua Nwabueze v The General Medical Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 6 April 2000
    ...Conduct Committee is responsible for deciding on the law as well as the facts. Lord Radcliffe explained the position in Fox v. General Medical Council [1960] 1 W.L.R. 1017, 1021 in words which, although he was dealing with the Disciplinary Committee of the General Medical Council under the......
  • Ling Uk Choon and Another v Public Accountants Board
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 28 June 2004
    ...the court’s role in a statutory appeal was as limited as originally suggested. He pointed out that in Fox v General Medical Council [1960] 1 WLR 1017, Lord Radcliffe said at Their Lordships think, therefore, that it would be an undue limitation of their duty and powers in dealing with the s......
  • R. v. D.C.B., (1994) 95 Man.R.(2d) 220 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Manitoba Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • 7 July 1994
    ...14 N.B.R.(2d) 452; 15 A.P.R. 452, consd. [para. 51]. R. v. Ambrose - see R. v. Hutchison and Ambrose. Fox v. General Medical Council, [1960] 3 All E.R. 225 (P.C.), consd. [para. R. v. Turner, [1975] 1 All E.R. 70 (C.A.), consd. [para. 72]. Watkins v. Olafson et al., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 750; 100......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Athwal and All That: Previous Statements, Narrative, and the Taxonomy of Hearsay
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 74-5, October 2010
    • 1 October 2010
    ...2009) did frame its recommendation in terms of ‘recent invention’:para. 10.76.49 [1918] 2 IR 361 esp. at 389, per Ronan LJ.50 [1960] 1 WLR 1017 at 1025 (emphasis added).Previous Statements, Narrative, and the Taxonomy of Hearsay423 The fabrication alleged need be ‘recent’ only in the sense ......
  • Administrative and Constitutional Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2004, December 2004
    • 1 December 2004
    ...of being heard, to exercise certain powers provided for in s 34(2). 1.5 Affirming the UK case of Fox v General Medical Council[1960] 1 WLR 1017, which supports the view that judicial powers in relation to statutory appeals transcend procedural ultra vires, Woo Bih Li J agreed that some ‘mea......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT