Fox v General Medical Council
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | Privy Council |
| Judgment Date | 1960 |
| Year | 1960 |
| Date | 1960 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
72 cases
- Public Prosecutor v Dato' Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim (No. 3)
-
Dr. Emmanuel Dibua Nwabueze v The General Medical Council
...Conduct Committee is responsible for deciding on the law as well as the facts. Lord Radcliffe explained the position in Fox v. General Medical Council [1960] 1 W.L.R. 1017, 1021 in words which, although he was dealing with the Disciplinary Committee of the General Medical Council under the......
-
Libman v General Medical Council
...were, on the evidence, entitled to come to the conclusion which they did (post, pp. 221E-222A). Fox v. General Medical Council [1960] 1 W.L.R. 1017, P.C.; Felix v. General Dental Council [1960] A.C. 704, P.C.;Sivarajah v. General Medical Council [1964] 1 W.L.R. 112, P.C. and Bhattacharya v.......
- Peatfield v General Medical Council
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Athwal and All That: Previous Statements, Narrative, and the Taxonomy of Hearsay
...2009) did frame its recommendation in terms of ‘recent invention’:para. 10.76.49 [1918] 2 IR 361 esp. at 389, per Ronan LJ.50 [1960] 1 WLR 1017 at 1025 (emphasis added).Previous Statements, Narrative, and the Taxonomy of Hearsay423 The fabrication alleged need be ‘recent’ only in the sense ......
-
Administrative and Constitutional Law
...of being heard, to exercise certain powers provided for in s 34(2). 1.5 Affirming the UK case of Fox v General Medical Council[1960] 1 WLR 1017, which supports the view that judicial powers in relation to statutory appeals transcend procedural ultra vires, Woo Bih Li J agreed that some ‘mea......
