Framlington Group Plc v Anderson
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1995 |
| Year | 1995 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Shepherds Investments Ltd v Walters and Others
...therefore in breach of fiduciary duty. 96 Mr Quirk pointed out that Balston has been cited and applied in at least three cases: Framlington Group plc v Anderson [1995] 1 BCLC 475 (Blackburne J); Saatchi & Saatchi Company plc v Saatchi (unreptd) 13.2.1995 (Jonathan Parker J); and Coleman Tay......
-
Foster Bryant Surveying Ltd and anor v Bryant and anor
...actual trading, while he remains a director.” 61 A third case in which no liability for breach of fiduciary duty was found is Framlington Group plc v. Anderson [1995] 1 BCLC 475, a decision of Blackburne J. There the defendant directors resigned on 3 January 1992 and promptly took up employ......
-
Cook v Ministry of Sound Ltd
...referred to G.D. Searle & Co. Ltd v. Celltech Ltd and Others [1982] FSR 92, at 99, 101, 102, per Cumming-Bruce LJ; Framlington Group plc and another v. Anderson and others [1995] 1 BCLC 475, at 497, 498, per Blackburne J; Saatchi & Saatchi Company Plc and Others v. Saatchi and Others 13 Fe......
-
Akkurate Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v John Christopher Richmond
...in the Trademarks on the part of Mr Richmond. 162 The Defendants place reliance on the case of Framlington Group plc v Anderson [1995] 1 BCLC 475. This was a case after a trial of an action with witnesses being called and cross-examined. It was a case about an employment contract where the ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Employee Competition: Recent Cases
...(para 66) that such a duty was non-existent, reliance being placed on Searle v Celltech [1982] FSR 92; Framlington Group v Anderson [1995] 1 BCLC 475; Saatchi & Saatchi v Saatchi 13 Feb 1995, unrep; and Helmet v Tunnard For MSHK, it was submitted (para 69) that, as a fiduciary, Mr Cook ......
3 books & journal articles
-
SELF-DEALING AND NO-PROFIT RULES: COMPANIES ACT 2016
...[2002] 2 BCLC 201. 151 [2007] BCC 804. 152 See Island Export Finance Ltd v Umunna [1986] BCLC 460 and Framlington Group plc v Anderson [1995] 1 BCLC 475. Cf Industrial Development Consultants Ltd v Cooley [1972] 2 All ER 162; Canadian Aero Service Ltd v O'Malley 40 DLR (3d) 371; and Natural......
-
Pure corporate control in South Africa : chapter 3 : part two : South Africa on corporate control
...because 208 Companies Act 61 of 1973: section 234(1). 209 Companies Act 61 of 1973: section 234(2).210 Framlington Group Plc v Anderson [1995] 1 BCLC 475.211 Island Expor t Finance Ltd v Umunna [1986] BCLC 460.212 Robinson v Randfontein Estates Gold Mining Co Ltd 1921 AD 168.213 Robinson v ......
-
The Corporate Opportunity Doctrine: The Shifting Boundaries of the Duty and its Remedies
...above.35 n 33 above, 482. See further, Farrar’s Company Law n 1 above, 424.36 [1990] FSR 385. See also, Framlington Group plc vAnderson [1995] 1 BCLC 475.37 See further, Lowry, ‘Regal (Hastings) Fifty Years On: Breaking The Bonds Of The Ancien Regime’(1994) 45 NILQ 1. See also, Delany, Equi......