Franchi v Franchi

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1967
CourtChancery Division (Patents Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
27 cases
  • QB Net Co Ltd v Earnson Management (S) Pte Ltd and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 17 d2 Outubro d2 2006
    ...and disclosure had already occurred as a result of the patents having been filed in Japan and overseas. 90 In Franchi v Franchi [1967] RPC 149, Cross J was faced with similar circumstances. The Belgian equivalent of the plaintiff’s British patent application was published in Belgium in June......
  • Apotex Fermentation Inc. et al. v. Novopharm Ltd. et al., (1998) 129 Man.R.(2d) 161 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Manitoba Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • 24 d3 Junho d3 1998
    ...the determination of the duration of the spring-board is 'a question of degree depending on the particular case' ( Franchi v. Franchi (1967), R.P.C. 149 at 153 per Cross, J.)." [181] Novopharm disputes Apotex's theory which it characterizes as a "quid pro quo reconciliation of time on a mon......
  • Worldwide Rota Dies Sdn Bhd v Ronald Ong Cheow Joon
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 d5 Janeiro d5 2010
  • Fraser v Thames Television Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
    ......Allied Newspapers Ltd. [ 1938 ] Ch. 106 ; [ 1937 ] 3 All E.R. 503 . . Fisher v. Marsh ( 1865 ) 6 B. & S. 411 . . Franchi v. Franchi [ 1967 ] R.P.C. 149 . . Fraser v. Edwardes [ 1905–10 ] Mac.C.C. 10 . . Gilbert v. Star Newspaper Co. Ltd. ( 1894 ) 11 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Trade Secrets' Under New Zealand Law
    • New Zealand
    • Canterbury Law Review No. 22-2016, January 2016
    • 1 d5 Janeiro d5 2016
    ...65 RPC 203 at 215: “…it must not be something which is public property and public knowledge”. 45 See, for example, Franchi v Franchi [1967] RPC 149. 46 See Aplin and Gurry, above n 36, at [5.46]-[5.47]. 47 See Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd , above n 43, at 47. 48 At 47. 49 See Saltman Eng......
  • REVISITING THE LAW OF CONFIDENCE IN SINGAPORE AND A PROPOSAL FOR A NEW TORT OF MISUSE OF PRIVATE INFORMATION
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2020, December 2020
    • 1 d2 Dezembro d2 2020
    ...Stephens v Avery [1988] Ch 449 at 454. 199 Douglas v Hello! Ltd (No 3) [2005] EWCA Civ 595; [2006] QB 125 at [55]. 200 Franchi v Franchi [1967] RPC 149 at 152–153. Citing this case, Sir John Donaldson MR in Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 2) [1990] 1 AC 109 at 177 said: As a ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT