Gardner v Jay

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1884
Date1884
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
38 cases
  • Foo Chiew Fong v Guriman
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Southard & Company Ltd Re
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 June 1979
    ...of facts will indicate that justice requires the exercise of discretion in a particular fashion. 20 Mr. Lindsay has referred us to Gardner v. Jay, reported in 29 Chancery Division at page 50, where Lord Justice Bowen, at page 58, expresses the view that where a judicial discretion is concer......
  • Osenton (Charles) & Company v Johnston
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 9 May 1941
    ...be of decisive importance on the final issue of the case, and one which requires a careful examination by the Court of Appeal. Thus in Gardner v. Jay (1885) 29 Ch.D. 50, 58, Bowen L.J. in discussing the discretion of the judge as regards mode of trial says: 'That discretion, like other judi......
  • Tan Boon Hai (on behalf of himself and all other unsuccessful candidates in the Singapore Hainan Hwee Kuan 1999/2000 Management Committee Elections) v Lee Ah Fong and Others
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 27 November 2001
    ... ... As Bowen LJ in Gardner v Jay [1885] 29 Ch D 50 at 58 said: ... [W]hen a tribunal is invested by Act of Parliament or by Rules with a discretion, without any indication in the Act or Rules of the grounds upon which the discretion is to be exercised, it is a mistake to lay down any rules with a view of ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Preliminary Sections
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1985. Part I Preliminary Sections
    • 22 November 2022
    ...199 ................................................................................................................. 313 Gradner v. Jay, 29 Ch. D. 50, 58. ........99 Haggard v. Pelicier Freres (1892) A C 61 .............................................................. 645 Hanson v. Radcli......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT