Gartside v Outram

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1857
Date1857
Year1857
CourtHigh Court of Chancery

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
33 cases
  • A v B
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 13 July 2005
    ... ... Nor would the law generally imply a duty of confidence. As it used to be said, "there is no confidence in iniquity": see e.g. Gartside v Outram (1857) 26 L.J. Ch. 113 ... The courts might well baulk at assisting in the concealment of Class A drug consumption, especially if it has ... ...
  • Initial Services Ltd v Putterill
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 28 June 1967
    ...longer in the service of a man who does such a thing. I will leave him and report it to the customers". It was so held in the case of Gartside v. Outram (1857) 26 Law Journal, Chancery, page 6 Mr Michael Kerr suggested that this exception was confined to cases where the master has been "gui......
  • Harrods Ltd v Times Newspapers Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 February 2006
    ...be able to make good that defence at a trial. That, as it seems to me, is consistent with the approach of Vice-Chancellor Page Wood in Gartside v Outram. 40 Faced with that difficulty, the claimant seeks to limit the relief sought by injunction. It seeks to amend the prayer for relief so as......
  • National Irish Bank Ltd v Raidió Teilifís Éireann
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 20 March 1998
    ... ... V EARL OF ANGLESEA 1743 17 ST 1139 LAVERY COMMERCIAL SECRETS: THE ACTION FOR BREACH OF CONFIDENCE IN IRELAND (1996) CH 6 GARTSIDE V OUTRAM 1856 26 LJ CH (NS) 113 INITIAL SERVICES LTD V PUTTERILL 1968 1 QB 396 HUBBARD V VOSPER 1972 2 QB 84 BELOFF V PRESSDRAM ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Lawyers, confidentiality and whistleblowing: lessons from the McCabe tobacco litigation.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 40 No. 3, April - April 2017
    • 1 April 2017
    ...did identify various issues with the way Cowell had pleaded the iniquity rule in this case: at [120]-[124]. (139) Ibid [7]. (140) (1857) 26 LJ Ch 113. (141) Koomen, above n 137, (142) [1968] 1 QB 396. (143) Ibid 405 (Lord Denning MR) quoted in Koomen, above n 137, 58. See also Aplin et al, ......