Gartside v Outram

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1857
Date1857
CourtHigh Court of Chancery
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
33 cases
  • A v B
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 13 July 2005
    ...Nor would the law generally imply a duty of confidence. As it used to be said, "there is no confidence in iniquity": see e.g. Gartside v Outram (1857) 26 L.J. Ch. 113. The courts might well baulk at assisting in the concealment of Class A drug consumption, especially if it has taken place i......
  • Harrods Ltd v Times Newspapers Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 February 2006
    ...employment law. 36 36. The foundation of this defence is to be found in the observation of Sir William Page Wood, Vice-Chancellor, in Gartside v Outram [1856] 26 LJ Ch 113, 114, that: "The true doctrine is, that there is no confidence as to the disclosure of iniquity." The plaintiffs in tha......
  • Initial Services Ltd v Putterill
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 28 June 1967
    ...longer in the service of a man who does such a thing. I will leave him and report it to the customers". It was so held in the case of Gartside v. Outram (1857) 26 Law Journal, Chancery, page 6 Mr Michael Kerr suggested that this exception was confined to cases where the master has been "gui......
  • National Irish Bank Ltd v Raidió Teilifís Éireann
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 20 March 1998
    ...... V EARL OF ANGLESEA 1743 17 ST 1139 LAVERY COMMERCIAL SECRETS: THE ACTION FOR BREACH OF CONFIDENCE IN IRELAND (1996) CH 6 GARTSIDE V OUTRAM 1856 26 LJ CH (NS) 113 INITIAL SERVICES LTD V PUTTERILL 1968 1 QB 396 HUBBARD V VOSPER 1972 2 QB 84 BELOFF V PRESSDRAM ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Lawyers, confidentiality and whistleblowing: lessons from the McCabe tobacco litigation.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 40 No. 3, April - April 2017
    • 1 April 2017
    ...did identify various issues with the way Cowell had pleaded the iniquity rule in this case: at [120]-[124]. (139) Ibid [7]. (140) (1857) 26 LJ Ch 113. (141) Koomen, above n 137, (142) [1968] 1 QB 396. (143) Ibid 405 (Lord Denning MR) quoted in Koomen, above n 137, 58. See also Aplin et al, ......
  • Whistle While You Work
    • Ireland
    • Cork Online Law Review No. 4-2005, January 2005
    • 1 January 2005
    ...corrupt and unethical behaviour. Paul Cullen, ‘Handling New York’s Bad Apples’ in The Irish Times (March 18, 2003) 9Gartside v Outram (1857) 26 LJ Ch 113 followed in Initial Services v Putterill [1968] 1 QB 396, Lion Laboratories v Evans [1985] AC 526 and in Re a Company’s Application [1989......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT