Geismar v Sun Alliance and London Insurance Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1977
Year1977
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
24 cases
  • Jumbal Sdn Bhd v Berjaya Sompo Insurance Berhad
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2015
  • Thackwell v Barclays Bank Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Quinn v IBRC (in special liquidation)
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 27 March 2015
    ...grounds.’ 7.11 Other cases, such as Ailion v. Spiekermann [1976] Ch. 158, and Geismar v. Sun Alliance and London Insurance Limited [1978] Q.B. 383, are sometimes cited to the same effect. In that later case, it is worth noting that Talbot J., at pp.388 and 389, having made reference to the ......
  • Tinsley v Milligan
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 24 June 1993
    ...in Spain, the plaintiff having innocently paid the money in breach of the Exchange Control Act 1947; and the fourth ( Geismar v. Sun Alliance and London Insurance Ltd [1978] Q.B. 383) was a case in which the plaintiff's claim to an indemnity under a contract of insurance, in respect of the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN SINGAPORE: THE LEGAL CHALLENGE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1999, December 1999
    • 1 December 1999
    ...citing Cleaver v Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association[1892] 1 QB 147 at 156. See also Geismar v Sun Alliance & London Insurance Ltd[1977] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 62 (insured not entitled to enforce an insurance indemnity against loss of articles which the insured deliberately imported into the countr......
  • VITIATING FACTORS IN CONTRACT LAW — THE INTERACTION OF THEORY AND PRACTICE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1998, December 1998
    • 1 December 1998
    ...Lord Halsbury LC; Printing & Numerical Registering Co v Sampson(1875) LR 19 Eq 462; and Geismar v Sun Alliance and London Insurance Ltd[1978] QB 383 at 389. CfBrooks v Burns Philp Trustee Co Ltd[1969] ALR 321 at 331—349. And see, in the Malaysian context and, in particular, s 24(e) of the C......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT