Geismar v Sun Alliance and London Insurance Ltd
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1977 |
Year | 1977 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
24 cases
- Jumbal Sdn Bhd v Berjaya Sompo Insurance Berhad
- Thackwell v Barclays Bank Plc
-
Quinn v IBRC (in special liquidation)
...grounds.’ 7.11 Other cases, such as Ailion v. Spiekermann [1976] Ch. 158, and Geismar v. Sun Alliance and London Insurance Limited [1978] Q.B. 383, are sometimes cited to the same effect. In that later case, it is worth noting that Talbot J., at pp.388 and 389, having made reference to the ......
-
Tinsley v Milligan
...in Spain, the plaintiff having innocently paid the money in breach of the Exchange Control Act 1947; and the fourth ( Geismar v. Sun Alliance and London Insurance Ltd [1978] Q.B. 383) was a case in which the plaintiff's claim to an indemnity under a contract of insurance, in respect of the......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN SINGAPORE: THE LEGAL CHALLENGE
...citing Cleaver v Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association[1892] 1 QB 147 at 156. See also Geismar v Sun Alliance & London Insurance Ltd[1977] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 62 (insured not entitled to enforce an insurance indemnity against loss of articles which the insured deliberately imported into the countr......
-
VITIATING FACTORS IN CONTRACT LAW — THE INTERACTION OF THEORY AND PRACTICE
...Lord Halsbury LC; Printing & Numerical Registering Co v Sampson(1875) LR 19 Eq 462; and Geismar v Sun Alliance and London Insurance Ltd[1978] QB 383 at 389. CfBrooks v Burns Philp Trustee Co Ltd[1969] ALR 321 at 331—349. And see, in the Malaysian context and, in particular, s 24(e) of the C......