George v Skivington

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtExchequer
Date1865
Year1865

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Heaven v Pender
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Winterbottom v. Wright (10 M. & W. 109) followed: George v. Skivington (Law Rep. 5 Ex. 1) disapproved of ... ACTION in the Bow County Court to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by ... ...
  • M'Alister or Donoghue (Pauper) v Stevenson
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 26 May 1932
    ...dangerous is in fact dangerous due to some defect or for any other reason, and this is known to the manufacturer. Until the case of George v. Skivington, L.R., 5 Ex., 1, I know of no further modification of the general rule. 16As to (1), in the case of things dangerous in themselves, there ......
  • Cann v Willson
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... George v. SkivingtonF1 and Heaven v. PenderF2 followed ... Peek v. DerryF3 discussed ... IN 1883 one Spark was desirous of obtaining an advance of money ... ...
  • Smith v Eric S Bush
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 20 April 1989
    ...to the plaintiff and use by him? That appears from the case of Langridge v. Levy [ (1837) 2 M. & W. 519] as extended by Cleasby, B. in George v. Skivington; [ (1869) L.R. 5 Ex. 1, 5] and from the decision of that good judge, Chitty, J., in Cann v. Willson, [ (1888) 39 Ch. D. 39] which is ......
  • Get Started for Free