Gesellschaft Burgerlichen Rechts and Others v Stockholms Rederiaktiebolag Svea; The Brabant
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
| Year | 1965 |
| Date | 1965 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
30 cases
-
Tor Line A.B. v Alltrans Group of Canada Ltd (TFL Prosperity)
...have held that it did not protect the owners in the events which had happened. 35 My Lords, the next decision is that of McNair J. in The Brabant [1967] 1 Q.B. 588. It was a complicated case in which the owners sought to rely on clause 13 but failed since the learned judge held that a speci......
-
CNM Estates (Tolworth Tower) Ltd v Vecref I Sarl
...other causes: see Westfal-Larsen and Co. A/S v. Sugar Refining Co. Ltd. [1960] 2 Lloyd's Rep 206 expressly approved by Mr. Justice McNair in The Brabant, [1967] 1 Q.B. 588. It seems to me somewhat arid to argue whether the exclusion of negligence is express or implied. The clause expressly ......
- Cosmos Bulk Transport Inc. v China National Foreign Trade Transportation Corporation (Apollonius)
- The Queen v Peter Hughes
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
The case of the sugar in the concrete: contaminated cargo
...in removing the sugar from areas such as the gusset plates, limbers, sheathing and tank top. He relied on the decision in "The Brabant" [1967] 1 QB 588, where a specially typed clause had read "the decks and holds and other cargo spaces to be properly cleaned at owners risk and expense befo......
