Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judge | LORD NICHOLLS OF BIRKENHEAD,LORD STEYN |
| Judgment Date | 21 June 2004 |
| Neutral Citation | [2004] UKHL 30 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 21 June 2004 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
677 cases
-
R Osman Omar v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...require it to be paid would be incompatible with a person's Convention rights. Bearing in mind the approach of the House of Lords in Ghaidan v Godin Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30, I do not consider that the implication of qualifying words with this effect contradicts the essential principles or sc......
-
Vodafone 2 v HM Revenue and Customs
...cannot interpret domestic legislation so as to conform to European Union law.” 47 Lady Justice Arden then referred to the case of Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557, a case under the Human Rights Act 1998 where, by Section 3 of that Act, courts construing United Kingdom legislation, w......
-
I v Dunn
...1; 2007 SLT 1026; 2007 SCCR 222; [2007] HRLR 28; 24 BHRC 412 Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza sub nom Ghaidan v MendozaUNKELRWLRUNKFLRUNKUNKUNK [2004] UKHL 30; [2004] 2 AC 557; [2004] 3 WLR 113; [2004] 3 All ER 411; [2004] 2 FLR 600; [2004] 2 FCR 481; [2004] HRLR 31; [2004] UKHRR 827; 16 BHRC 671; [......
-
BXS v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...approach to questions arising under article 14 and, in particular, to questions of comparators. He cited several authorities. They included Ghaidan [2004] UKHL 30, where Baroness Hale at paragraph 134 discussed the ' Michalak questions', as a useful tool of analysis, but which overlap. In ......
Request a trial to view additional results
63 books & journal articles
-
Constitutional avoidance as interpretation and as remedy.
...wording if doing so would make the statute compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights."). (145.) Ghaidan v. Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30, [32]--[33], [2004] 2 AC 557 (appeal taken from Eng.), http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/1d200304/1djudgmt/jd040621/gha-l.htm [http://......
-
Table of Cases
...1 WLR 1255, [1964] 3 All ER 373, 108 SJ 839 51, 53, 58, 184 McNulty v McNulty [2002] EWHC 123 (Ch), [2002] WTLR 737 49 Mendoza v Ghaidan [2004] UKHL 30, [2004] 2 AC 557, [2004] 3 WLR 113, HL; [2002] EWCA Civ 1533, [2003] 2 WLR 478, [2002] 4 All ER 1162, [2003] 1 FLR 468, CA 3, 91–2 Miller, ......
-
Court of Appeal
...post-HRA 1998 is potentiallyfraught.With regard to the application of s. 3 of the HRA 1998, the courtconsidered Ghaidan vGodin Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30, [2004] 2 AC 557,where Lord Nicholls stated:Section 3 enables language to be interpreted restrictively or expansively.But section 3 goes furt......
-
Reverse Burden and Article 6(2) of the European Convention on Human Rights: Drunk in Charge; Terrorism Offence
...This case suggests that declarations of incompatibility are to beregarded as measures of last resort (see also Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza[2004] UKHL 30, [2004] 3 WLR 113).Ben FitzpatrickJuries: Secrecy of DeliberationsAttorney-General v Scotcher [2005] UKHL 36, [2005] 1 WLR 1867The defendant s......
Request a trial to view additional results