Gibbs v Cole
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 May 1734 |
| Date | 01 May 1734 |
| Court | High Court of Chancery |
English Reports Citation: 21 E.R. 192
HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY
192 GIBBS V. COLE DICKENS, 65. gibbs v. cole. (Reg. Lib. A. fol. 338.) 1 May 1734. 3 P. Wms. 225, S. C.; 2 Eq. Abr. 14, S. C. Upon application to dissolve an injunction upon coming in of the answer, which was to stay the printing and publishing of a book, the Lord Chancellor said, it was proper to allow affidavits to be read in support of the injunction ; and affidavits were read. Note.-The order for the injunction is dated the 28th of February 1733, Reg. Lib. A. fol. 194, and appears to be founded on the affidavit of the plaintiff. On shewing cause to continue it, the first day of May 1734, not only the affidavit of the plaintiff which was read when the injunction was granted, but also an affidavit of Job Mills and of John Baldoch were read in support of it. If affidavits were allowable in a case where a plaintiff may have satisfaction in some degree against a defendant by making him account for the profits, a fortiori there is reason to allow them to be read where no reparation in damages can be made, as for cutting down trees planted, or growing for pleasure, ornament, or shelter.
English Reports Citation: 24 E.R. 1051
LORD CHANCELLOR TALBOT.
[255] Case 62.-gibbs v. cole...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Isaac against Humpage and Others
...that a material mistake occurs in Mr. Tesefs statement of this case in the contemporary report (1 Ves. jun. 429Strathmore v. Bowes (S. C. 2 Bro. C. C. 88, 89), 3 P. Wms. 255 a (where other cases are cited, in which the same thing has been done), to shew that it was Lord Kenyan's opinion tha......
-
Smythe v Smythe
...Ib. 4] 9. Williams v. M'Namara, 8 Fes. 70. Surges v. Lamb, 16 Ves. 174. Day v. Merry, Ib. 37" . Delapole v. Delapole, 17 Ves. 150Gibbs v. Cole, 3 P. Wms. 255. Potter v. Chapman, Amb. 99. Robinson v. Byron, 1 Bro. C. C. 588. Countess of titrathmore v. Bowes, 2 Dick. 673; 2 Bro. C. C. 88; 1 C......