Gidrxslme Shipping Company Ltd v Tantomar Transporters Maritimos Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
| Judgment Date | 11 May 1994 |
| Date | 11 May 1994 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
30 cases
-
TSJ Engineering Consulting Ltd Appellant/Respondent v (1) Al-Rushaid Petroleum Investment Company (2) Al-Rushaid Parker Drilling Ltd (Both Companies Incorporated under the Laws of Saudi Arabia) Respondents/Applicants
...Maclaine Watson & Co. Ltd. v International Tin Council (No. 2) [1989] Ch. 286 and Gidrxslme Shipping Co. v Tantomar-Transportes Lda [1995] 1 W.L.R. 299 distinguished. 2. Since the notice of appeal is struck out the application for stay of execution of the Norwich Pharmacal order is render......
-
Nomihold Securites Inc. v Mobile Telesystems Finance SA
...be disposed of without trial". 34 As for Mr Salzedo's reference to the English supervisory jurisdiction, he refers to both The Naftilos [1995] 1 WLR 299, at 304, and Cetelem SA v Roust Holdings Ltd [2005] 1 WLR 3555 CA per Clarke LJ at 62, to emphasise that a (worldwide) freezing order—whic......
-
Cruz City 1 Mauritius Holdings v Unitech Ltd
...v) It is the policy of the English court that arbitration awards should be satisfied and executed; see per Colman J in The Naftilos [1995] 1 WLR 299, at 309–310. As Field J said at [31] in his judgment in this case: '… it is the policy of the law that judgments of the court and arbitration ......
-
Cruz City 1 Mauritius Holdings v Unitech Ltd and Others
...v) It is the policy of the English court that arbitration awards should be satisfied and executed; see per Colman J in The Naftilos [1995] 1 WLR 299, at 309–310. As Field J said at [31] in his judgment in this case: "… it is the policy of the law that judgments of the court and arbitration ......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Freezing Injunctions And Enforcement
...v Senatorov [2-12] 1 JLR 168 and the English decision of Coleman J in Gidrxsime Shipping Co Ltd v Tantomar-Transportes Maritimos Lda [1994] 4 All ER 507. *** [2014] EWCA Civ 636 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice shoul......
1 books & journal articles
-
Case Note: INTERIM MEASURES IN AID OF FOREIGN ARBITRATION — A RE-THINK1
...Unisoft Group Ltd [1993] BCLC 1292. 45 Similar positions were adopted in Gidrxslme Shipping Co Ltd v Tantomar-Transportes Maritimos Lda[1994] 4 All ER 507 at 514; BNP Paribas v Deloitte & Touche LLP[2003] EWHC 2874. 46 [2007] 1 SLR 629 at [20]. 47 Section 44 of the English Arbitration Act 1......