Gidrxslme Shipping Company Ltd v Tantomar Transporters Maritimos Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Judgment Date11 May 1994
Date11 May 1994

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
29 cases
  • TSJ Engineering Consulting Ltd Appellant/Respondent v (1) Al-Rushaid Petroleum Investment Company (2) Al-Rushaid Parker Drilling Ltd (Both Companies Incorporated under the Laws of Saudi Arabia) Respondents/Applicants
    • British Virgin Islands
    • Court of Appeal (British Virgin Islands)
    • 27 July 2010
    ...Maclaine Watson & Co. Ltd. v International Tin Council (No. 2) [1989] Ch. 286 and Gidrxslme Shipping Co. v Tantomar-Transportes Lda [1995] 1 W.L.R. 299 distinguished. 2. Since the notice of appeal is struck out the application for stay of execution of the Norwich Pharmacal order is render......
  • Cruz City 1 Mauritius Holdings v Unitech Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 2 October 2014
    ...v) It is the policy of the English court that arbitration awards should be satisfied and executed; see per Colman J in The Naftilos [1995] 1 WLR 299, at 309–310. As Field J said at [31] in his judgment in this case: '… it is the policy of the law that judgments of the court and arbitration ......
  • Nomihold Securites Inc. v Mobile Telesystems Finance SA
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 1 August 2011
    ...be disposed of without trial". 34 As for Mr Salzedo's reference to the English supervisory jurisdiction, he refers to both The Naftilos [1995] 1 WLR 299, at 304, and Cetelem SA v Roust Holdings Ltd [2005] 1 WLR 3555 CA per Clarke LJ at 62, to emphasise that a (worldwide) freezing order—whic......
  • Cruz City 1 Mauritius Holdings v Unitech Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 November 2013
    ...v) It is the policy of the English court that arbitration awards should be satisfied and executed; see per Colman J in The Naftilos [1995] 1 WLR 299, at 309–310. As Field J said at [31] in his judgment in this case: "… it is the policy of the law that judgments of the court and arbitration ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Freezing Injunctions And Enforcement
    • Jersey
    • Mondaq Jersey
    • 5 November 2015
    ...v Senatorov [2-12] 1 JLR 168 and the English decision of Coleman J in Gidrxsime Shipping Co Ltd v Tantomar-Transportes Maritimos Lda [1994] 4 All ER 507. *** [2014] EWCA Civ 636 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice shoul......
6 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 7: Freezing Injunctions
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis The Practice and Procedure of the Commercial Court
    • Invalid date
    ...p. 203. 363 Derby & Co. Ltd. v. Weldon (Nos 3 and 4) [1990] Ch. 65, per Neill, L.J., at 94–95. 364 Gidrxslme Shipping Co. Ltd. v. Tantomar Transportes Maritimos Lda. [1995] 1 W.L.R. 299 and see generally Maclaine Watson & Co. Ltd. v. International Tin Council (No. 2) [1987] 1 W.L.R. 1711 (M......
  • Chapter 18: Security for claims in arbitration
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis London Maritime Arbitration
    • Invalid date
    ...assets. 44 The aim of all such ancillary orders is to enhance the effectiveness of the freezing injunction. In Gidrxslme Shipping Co v Tantomar-Transportes Lda, 45 owners obtained two arbitration awards against charterers, and then obtained a freezing injunction in aid of execution. The inj......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis The Practice and Procedure of the Commercial Court
    • Invalid date
    ...Inc. [1998] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 544 37 Gidrxslme Shipping Co. Ltd. v. Tantomar Transportes Maritimos Lda. [1994] 2 Lloyd’ s Rep. 394; [1995] 1 W.L.R 299 187 Gill v. Flightwise Travel Service Ltd. [2003] EWHC 3082 (Ch) 111, 178 Goldleaf Investments Inc. v. Moneverdi Onyx Ltd, unreported, Lexis tr......
  • Enforcement of an English or Foreign Award
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis A Practical Guide to International Arbitration in London
    • Invalid date
    ...Ipco, supra . 17 Rosseel N.V. v Oriental Commercial Shipping (U.K.) Ltd & ors [1990] 1 W.L.R. 1387. 18 Gidrxslme Shipping Co. Ltd v Tantomar-Transportes Maritimos LDA [1995] 1 W.L.R. 299. 19 The procedure for obtaining such an order is set out in Part 72 and Practice Direction 72 of the CPR......
  • Get Started for Free