Gill & Duffus (Liverpool) Ltd v Scruttons Ltd (Ravenspoint.)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1953
Date1953
CourtAssizes

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
  • Gibson and Stiassny v Stockco Limited and ORS
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 17 Diciembre 2010
    ...Co Ltd [1913] AC 680, Spence v Union Marine Insurance Co Ltd (1868) LR 3 CP 427, and Gill and Duffus (Liverpool) Ltd v Scruttons Ltd [1953] 1 WLR 1407; [1953] 2 All ER [250] As the decisions in Indian Oil Corporation Ltd v Greenstone Shipping SA (Panama) and Coleman v Harvey and the summari......
  • Samsung Corp v Devon Industries Sdn Bhd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 26 Octubre 1995
    ...the only way to do real justice to all parties concerned. See Gill & Duffus (Liverpool) Ltd v Scruttons, Ltd [1953] 2 Lloyd`s Rep 545; [1953] 2 All ER 977. In this case all parties agreed to act in accordance with the rule.Claim ...
1 books & journal articles
  • Dazed and Confused: Accidental Mixtures of Goods and the Theory of Acquisition of Title
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 66-3, May 2003
    • 1 Mayo 2003
    ...unresolved, question as to the consistency of Spence with the later (and higher)ruling in Sandeman.48 [1914] AC 398.49 Ibid, 458.50 [1953] 2 All ER 977.51 Ibid, 983. Counsel agreed that this was the result, and the judgment avowedly makes no attempt todiscuss the principles of law to be der......