Gleeson v J. Wippell & Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1977 |
| Date | 1977 |
| Year | 1977 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
311 cases
-
GH Ltd v Bould
...7 C.P. 547. (2) Cayman Arms (1982) Ltd. v. English Shoppe Ltd., 1990–91 CILR 299, distinguished. (3) Gleeson v. J. Wippell & Co. Ltd., [1977] 1 W.L.R. 510; [1977] 3 All E.R. 54, distinguished. (4) Goldrei, Foucard & Son v. Sinclair, [1918] 1 K.B. 180; [1916–17] All E.R. Rep. 898, distinguis......
- Cheah Theam Swee and Another v Overseas Union Bank Ltd and Others
- Bimacom Property & Development Sdn Bhd; PP Persero Sdn Bhd
- Hong Leong Finance Bhd and Another; Kluang Wood Products Sdn Bhd and Another
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Not So Fast ' English Commercial Court Finds That LCIA Award Does Not Bind Third Parties
...Arbitration were "Gleeson privies." Foxton J applied the test for issue estoppel laid out by Megarry VC in Gleeson v Wippell & Co Ltd [1977] 1 WLR 510, Ch D. In that case, Megarry VC described the doctrine of privity as being "narrow" and went on to state that "having due regard to the subj......
-
Madison Pacific Trust v Shakoor Capital: A More Nuanced Approach To Illegality?
...had sought to claim trust property from a third party are binding on all the beneficiaries of a trust, see Gleeson v Wipple & Co Ltd [1977] 1 WLR 510 at Zacaroli J found that there was a sufficient degree of identification between the interests of the trustee (Madison) and all the UAHs such......
5 books & journal articles
-
Criteria for Registration in Commons Act 2006, Section 15
...be given, and the 53 Wakefield Corporation v Cooke [1904] AC 31 at 36. 54 Applying the test of Megarry V-C in Gleeson v J Wippell & Co [1977] 1 WLR 510 at 515G (which was approved by Lord Bingham in Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2000] UKHL 65, [2002] 2 AC 1 at 32E–G). 55 Wakefield Corporation v......
-
Table of Cases
...978, ChD 27 Gleaston Green, Aldingham, North Lonsdale RD, Lancashire, Re (20/D/3), Re; 20 July 1972 114 Gleeson v J Wippell & Co Ltd [1977] 1 WLR 510, [1977] 3 All ER 54, [1977] FSR 301, ChD 85 GLN (Copenhagen) Southern Ltd v ABC Cinemas Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 1279, [2005] LLR 282 285 Gold......
-
PROBLEMS IN THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF US CLASS ACTION JUDGMENTS IN SINGAPORE
...at 252; see also Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (No 3)[1970] Ch 506 at 541. 121[1967] 1 AC 853. 122[1967] 1 AC 853 at 910. 123[1977] 1 WLR 510 at 516. 124[1991] 1 QB 241. 125 Specifically, the plaintiffs commenced a first round of proceedings in Ireland against the three defendan......
-
The Recognition, and Res Judicata Effect, of a United States Class Actions Judgment in England: A Rebuttal of V
ivendi
...by proving one128 Dadourian Group Intl vSimms [2006] EWHC 2973 (Ch) at [715] citing Carl Zeiss n above 79,909–910 and Gleeson vWhippell [1977] 1 WLR 510 (Ch) 515.129 Barnett, n 78 above,70–71, and Gleeson ibid, requiring‘a sufficient degree of identification betweenthe two’.Views differ on th......
Request a trial to view additional results