Glynn v Margetson & Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Judgment Date | 01 May 1893 |
| Date | 01 May 1893 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
120 cases
-
Frenkel v MacAndrews & Company
...matter of construction in their favour, and of these the most important are: 7 Leduc v. Ward , 20 Queen's Bench Division, page 475, and Glynn v. Margetson, 1892, 1 Q.B. 337. In the former case goods were shipped for delivery at Dunkirk on a vessel lying at Fiume and bound for Dunkirk with l......
- Mayfair Photographic Supplies (London) Ltd v Baxter Hoare & Company Ltd
-
Homburg Houtimport BV v Agrosin Private Ltd (Starsin)
...Words which the parties have themselves chosen and written into the contract should have greater effect than printed standard terms: Glynn v Margetson & Co [1893] AC 351. 8 In submitting that these were shipowner's and not charterer's bills, as the Court of Appeal majority had held, Mr Mill......
-
The "Sumi Maru 9001"
...failure or refusal to perform an obligation under the contract.A direct authority in support is Glynn & Ors v Margetson & Co & Ors [1893] AC 351 There, oranges were shipped from Malaga to Liverpool under a bill of lading which allowed the ship to proceed and stay at any port or ports in any......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Amending FIDIC Provisions on Delay Liquidated Damages: a Case Note on J Murphy & Sons Ltd v Beckton Energy Ltd [2016] EWHC 607 (TCC)
...[11] Lord Steyn, paras. 45-46, Homburg Houtimport BV v Agrosin Private Ltd (the ‘Starsin’) [2003] UKHL 12. [12] Glynn v Margetson & Co [1893] AC 351. [13] Lord Bingham of Cornhill, para. 7, Homburg Houtimport BV v Agrosin Private Ltd (the ‘Starsin’) [2003] UKHL [14] Balfour Beatty Civil Eng......