Goldsmith v Pressdram Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1976
Year1976
CourtQueen's Bench Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Desmond v Thorne
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
    ...A.C. 477; [1979] 2 W.L.R. 665; [1979] 2 All E.R. 497, H.L.(E.). Goldsmith v. Pressdram Ltd. [1977] Q.B. 83; [1967] 3 W.L.R. 191; [1977] 2 All E.R. 557. Rex v. Wicks [1936] 1 All E.R. 384, The following additional case was cited in argument: Reg. v. George Maxwell (Developments) Ltd. [1980] ......
  • Royal Gazette Ltd v Attorney General
    • Bermuda
    • Supreme Court (Bermuda)
    • 27 Agosto 1982
    ...the Respondents The following cases were referred to in the judgment: Ghani v JonesELR [1970] 1 QB 696 Goldsmith v Pressdram LtdUNK [1977] 2 All ER 557 Karuma v RELR [1955] AC 197 British Steel Corp v Granada TelevisionUNK [1981] 1 All ER 417 Senior v HoldsworthUNK [1975] 2 All ER 1009 Maha......
  • R. v. Stevens (B.G.),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • 22 Febrero 1995
    ...this stage in the evolution of criminal libel since it has already been admirably conducted by Wien, J., in Goldsmith v. Pressdram Ltd. , [1977] Q.B. 83,90. Suffice it to say that the notion that a tendency to provoke a breach of the peace is an essential ingredient of the criminal offence ......
  • R v Wells Street Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Deakin
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 10 Abril 1979
    ...of a trivial character: it must be such as to provoke anger or cause resentment. The emphasis of the passage, as Wien J. recognised in Goldsmith's case (p.87F), is upon the character of the language used. In my judgment, the references in the case law to reputation, outrage, cruelty or tend......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Defamation of the President of Zambia: Contextualising the Decriminalisation Debate
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Southern African Public Law No. 36-2, December 2021
    • 1 Diciembre 2021
    ...Hob 215; R v Summers (1665) 1 Lev 139; R v Saunders (1670) T Raym 201; R v Holbrook (1878) 4 QBD 42, 46. 61 Gold smith v Pressdram Ltd [1977] QB 83. 62 Con stitution of Zambia 1991, as amended by Act no 2 of 2016, Article 110. 63 Compare poll statistics from previous elections (available at......
  • Criminal Defamation in the Commonwealth - a Case for Abolition
    • United Kingdom
    • 2005 Meeting of Commonwealth Law Ministers and Senior Officials Memoranda Criminal Law Issues
    • 1 Enero 2006
    ...Books,1992), p. 46. [4] The Law Commission, Consultation Paper No 84, HMSO 1982. [5] Sections 4 and 5. [6] See Goldsmith v. Pressdram [1977] QB 83, Gleaves v. Deakin [1980] AC 477 and Desmonde v. Thorpe [1982] 3 All ER None of these cases have gone to trial because either the plaintiffs fai......